Final proposal for $LINEA Airdrop eligibility and distribution base on community feedback!$$$$

thank for your comment, I 'll have a look on it

2 Likes

I’m a loyal Linea user and have been actively involved since the testnet phase. I hold the Alpha NFT, 7,096 LXP, and over 7 million LXP-L. Based on my experiences over the past year, I’d like to share a few suggestions regarding decentralization:

  1. High Cost of Earning LXP Before Linea Park:
    Before the Linea Park event, the cost of earning LXP was extremely high due to Ethereum’s pre-Cancun upgrade, which made gas fees very expensive. After the upgrade, however, the cost of earning LXP became significantly lower.
  2. Challenges for New Users to Earn LXP:
    If I recall correctly, for new users who joined Linea starting with Linea Park, it was difficult to accumulate more than 2,000 LXP. With only four reward tiers, this structure might unintentionally penalize newer users. I believe creating more tier levels to better accommodate both new and veteran users would be a fairer approach.
  3. Centralization Risks with LXP-L Distribution:
    The OpenBlock dashboard displays the total LXP-L supply, the average amount, and the number of participating addresses. From this data, it’s clear that lxp-l is heavily concentrated among a small group of users. As a public blockchain, Linea must prioritize sufficient decentralization. If the network leans too heavily toward benefiting a minority of users, it risks becoming a blockchain for the few.
  4. Incentives for POH-Verified Addresses:
    POH is a defining feature of the Linea community, distinguishing it from others. It reflects the high quality of the user base and serves as an effective method for mitigating Sybil attacks. I suggest allocating incentives more favorably toward addresses verified through POH.
  5. Tokenomics and Secondary Market Performance:
    I’ve noticed that Layer 2 solutions like zkSync, StarkNet, and Scroll have launched tokens, but their secondary market performance has been underwhelming. I believe this is largely due to their low circulation supply and high FDV token models. For Linea to stand out among Layer 2 networks, designing a robust tokenomics model that ensures strong secondary market performance could be a key differentiator.

If Linea aims to execute a successful TGE, I believe these points deserve serious consideration.

6 Likes

I agree with some of your points, but there is one aspect where you are mistaken. Among users with less than 2000 LXP, there are many DeFi Voyage users and Linea Park users from before the Cancun upgrade. These users also paid high gas fees.

1 Like

The Cancun upgrade took place just a few days before Linea Park ended.Therefore, most Linea Park users still paid the high gas fees from before the Cancun upgrade.

1 Like

they should participating in “loyal program” after the airdrop and their LXP are kept.

2 Likes


Your idea is selfish and goes against the original intention of the Linea Voyage XP campaign. The official documentation of Linea Voyage XP clearly states that there will be no ranking of Voyagers.

This one is for Defi campaign only, threshold/minimum LXP is a good way to remove sybils/hunters for any airdrop in this space!!! I know that not all of guys < 2000 LXP are sybil but they are not contribute enough, just keep contributing after the airdrop.

1 Like

You still don’t understand the core intention of this entire campaign.
“We want to keep the focus on education and exploration of L2 DeFi, so the DeFi Voyage will not employ any tiering system for Voyagers.”
This is the declaration made at the launch of Linea Voyage.

2 Likes

thanks for your comment but it is up to the team, not me

1 Like

If there is LXP, there must be an airdrop, and the amount of the airdrop should depend on the quantity of LXP. If you’re concerned about fairness for users before the Cancun upgrade, you can give those users extra rewards instead of penalizing new users.

1 Like

yeah the campaign was for education. I’am educated , i liked it and i stayed on chain for other campaigns and daily uses.
I also got tradeable nft + lxp reward for it.
2000 lxp was easy to get.
if you only get 2k lxp for 2 years thats kinda low and shows that you are probably got angry and left the chain or that wallet is a multi.
if team decides to reward below 2k lxp we will be worse than scroll or zk.

there are 814.000 wallets with < 2000 lxp

for pre-cancun you are right so team can measure fee spent per wallet and add a extra bonus or multiplier for it.

What we really need to focus on is LXP is way more important than LXP-L
LXP rewards should at least get like %65 of total reward
i just saw a wallet bring 80m worth of btc to linea for 11 days(around July) and left, now that wallet is on top 10 on openblock list

3 Likes

Suggestions for additional rewards or multiplier criteria to identify organic and daily users :

  • Participating for both campaigns LXP + LXP-L Surge (multiplier for the ones who stayed for all 6 Volts)
  • Total Fee spent
1 Like

That’s the game. Why dont you refer to other project such as ARB or STRK, if you dont have enough contribution to the network, you shouldn’t be rewarded. Because reward is not for everyone. If you dont have enough contribution comparing to other users. You shall be rejected. I dont see any project that give the reward to all users. Just the proactive user, and usually around 600-700k wallets, should be given the award.

2 Likes

the concept of Scroll should be applied. Who have the <2000lxp, will have the opportunity to continue contributing to the network and get the reward in the future

2 Likes

I don’t recommend it. From the beginning, the team said that LXP and LXP-L are separated. So I would rather the separate reward for them also

1 Like

Airdrops need to consider the bigger picture. In my opinion, 2000 LXP is too much—only thresholds below 300/500 should be considered to save on gas fees and filter out multi-account abusers, speculators, or disloyal participants. Linea doesn’t need sybil attackers or rule-breakers; it needs more newcomers and wealthy whales. If the criteria are set too rigidly without flexibility, it won’t benefit Linea’s post-airdrop ecosystem. Just look at the current situation with Scroll for reference.

1 Like

Such a selfish idea, are you still using it now? I can tell you that many people are still using linea without it. Isn’t that loyalty?Building for lxp is not called loyalty.You are speaking to maximize your own interests.zksync’s story is not over yet

1 Like

Thinking very objectively, these are the people who are truly good for the ecology. Only by being grateful is the greatest kindness to the ecology, rather than deliberately creating opposition and contradictions.

1 Like

Hi, you didn’t quote me, but I assume your reply was directed at me. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Yes, I’m still using Linea. The system I had in mind isn’t entirely based on LXP ownership. On the contrary, if you revisit the extra rewards or multiplier criteria I proposed, you’ll see that my intention is to ensure that people who discovered Linea later and couldn’t accumulate much LXP can also be rewarded—alongside those who’ve been here for two years.

I’m not interested in the story of zkSync, but it’s clear that they had a bad start. I’m not a developer, but there’s something called Selenium multi-browser automation, and if you search “Linea LXP” on Twitter, you’ll see people farming LXP with 5–10 accounts. That’s my main concern.

I believe fair distribution is the most important aspect, and it needs to be ensured.

3 Likes

good point. Also allocate future rewards for pure LINEA token stakers.

1 Like