Proposal for Fair and Inclusive Token Distribution: Prioritizing On-Chain Activity Over Specific NFT Multipliers

Please do not post suggestions on the forum that include other groups of people worthy of privileges. Let them go underradar. This poor guy will not survive such a blow.

Well, attempts to introduce sibyl criteria will obviously not lead to anything good. There are no idiots here.

It’s unlikely that anyone will take seriously someone who uses ChatGPT to write an article about “why eFrogs don’t deserve the bonus.” Looks like life has really cornered you if you have to resort to such tactics))) I’ve read the forum, and all your attacks (alts also) have already been addressed. I recommend you read through them as well.

You are all free to share your thoughts and opinions but please remain respectful towards other community members and keep discussions here related to the topic.

4 Likes

It’s ironic that you’re accusing me of using ChatGPT when it’s pretty clear you and your tiny frog sybil group is relying on it for your factless, clueless, and baseless arguments. Let me ask you one simple question that none of you have been able to answer, Linea clearly promised rewards for LXP holders, who promised you any reward for holding that random NFT? The answer is nobody. You’re irrelevant in this discussion, and no matter how much noise you make, you won’t get the airdrop you’re desperately lobbying for. So keep dreaming.

Firstly, I don’t have any NFT except linpus.
Secondly, I’m not from the eFrogs community.

Thirdly, bingoooooo, dude, no one promised. Did you finally realize it? Why are you so scared about it then? The guys just suggested it on the forum, and you launched a whole agressive campaign attacking the community :joy:

Fourthly, one more fake or false “accusation” directed at me, and I will report your post. Then you can complain about how you were reported for no reason.

2 Likes

3 Likes

So now you’re claiming you’re not part of that tiny group? Interesting how you’re so invested in their cause despite supposedly having no stake in it. Sounds like you’re doing their lobbying for them.

As for your bingo moment yes, no one promised you or that tiny group anything. That’s exactly my point. You’re trying to impose your baseless demands on the community, and when people call you out, you deflect or play victim.
And as for the reporting threat, let’s not forget who started throwing baseless accusations in the first place, you. So spare me the dramatics.

The reason I wrote in this thread lies in the fact that I genuinely care about the Linea ecosystem and understand the importance and value of all communities, including eFrogs. This is a cornerstone community that sets and sustains the vibe across the entire network, as you’ve already noticed, without any expectations of a drop - just because they care. Tone down your greed and start thinking broader.

At the same time, I see your blatant motivation to lobby sybil criteria for the token distribution approach.

As for the “groups” you’re talking about, only you, the fantasist, know what you mean. I’m responding to your message and reporting it. I warned you - stop fabricating fakes.

1 Like

The reason I wrote in this thread is because I genuinely care about fairness within the Linea ecosystem, unlike some who seem to care more about lobbying for personal gain. I respect all communities, including eFrogs, but let’s not pretend they’re some selfless cornerstone of the network. If they were truly setting the vibe without any expectations, they wouldn’t be aggressively pushing for disproportionate rewards.

It’s ironic how you accuse me of lobbying for sybil criteria when the entire eFrogs agenda revolves around getting a multiplier for a third party NFT, which no one ever promised anything for. Maybe take your own advice and think broader about fairness for everyone, not just a small group with a loud voice.

As for your baseless accusations and reporting threats, go ahead. The irony is you’re the one fabricating narratives here. Don’t dish out warnings you can’t back up.

More empty chatter. You’re not worth a drop of attention. Empty words.

If I’m not worth a drop of attention, then why are you so obsessed with commenting on my post? Clearly, I’ve struck a nerve, and your desperate need to respond only proves it. You’re full of contradictions and hollow arguments, trying hard to sound relevant while contributing absolutely nothing. So save your empty words and inflated ego for someone who cares because your presence here is as meaningless as the points you’re trying to make.

Great community member, lol.

1 Like

The funniest thing about this topic is how the author fantasizes about how he deals with eFrogs, assigns forum users to some groups, while the eFrogs themselves don’t even know about it, because they don’t care. Not a single OG frog posted in this topic

8 Likes

I agree and even I raised concerns. :upside_down_face:

here are links

1 Like


Everyone can clearly see who you are and what you’re doing. Just like it’s obvious that this is your alt account - you don’t need to be a scientist to connect the dots. Relax already, the team has made its decisions, and the circus can come to an end.

6 Likes

lol, nothing surprising

:sob: :sob::sob: :sob::sob: :sob::sob: :sob: literally dude put efforts to write text of his own. i mean tf. :joy: :sob:

Classic desperation move when they can’t win the argument, they resort to fake edits and lies. Pathetic. If they had a real point, they wouldn’t need to fabricate

also provide link or you gonna blame its deleted (which you’ll eventually say) :sob:

1 Like

I have Efrog, but I wonder: why all this discussion? If you had one or more Efrogs, you certainly wouldn’t be talking about this. After all, everyone is just pursuing their own goals. Saying that NFT holders are seeking privileges is unfair.

Many people have contributed to the ecosystem and own these NFTs, so it’s natural that they want a bonus (I would like one too). Similarly, some advocate for a bonus for those who made transactions before Dencun, when fees were high, for those who participated in the testnet, for those who have the MM card, for those holding FOXY, or for those who took part in gaming campaigns on Linea.

I’ve seen a lot in this space, and the truth is, these people aren’t wrong for wanting benefits—after all, everyone seeks what’s best for themselves. It’s important to understand that. Trying to act like a good Samaritan won’t help you. The only thing that can truly benefit you is meeting as many requirements as possible.

Of the examples I mentioned, there’s only one I don’t qualify for: the Metamask card, which requires a passport, and I don’t have one. Still, I understand that not everything I’ve done guarantees eligibility.

The discussion started because Efrog holders claimed to be OGs and demanded a 5 point bonus, supposedly equivalent to 6000 LXP. My stance remains the same: holding an NFT alone doesn’t prove loyalty or contribution, active participation does.

That’s why I suggested that if Efrog holders truly consider themselves OGs, then any wallet that holds an Efrog NFT and has at least 6000+ LXP can get that bonus. This way, real contributors get rewarded, not just those who held an NFT and did nothing else.

Lol, how is the amount of LXP related to the community and contribution to its development? An idiotic proposition. Linea generally divided these 2 facts into different categories. To know this, all you had to do was visit AMA and read Twitter at least sometimes.

I met people at conferences who have 0 LXP, but who are the strongest contributors. I can imagine your face when you find out that the number of your competitors for money that you didn’t even know about :joy: