End the Privilege Game: Prioritize Merit, Not Hype: NFTs Shouldn’t Overshadow Contributors

Rewarding NFT holders with significant multipliers AS SUGGESTED IN FEW TOKEN DESIGN is a misguided and unfair approach that undermines the values of equity and genuine long term contribution within the Linea ecosystem.

Here’s a breakdown of why this approach fails:

Promoting Free-Riding Over Participation

Allocating significant rewards to NFT holders encourages passive “buy-in” behavior. Why contribute to the ecosystem when holding an NFT alone becomes a shortcut to large rewards? This approach disincentivizes meaningful participation and undermines the principles of active engagement that Linea was built upon.

Minimal Ecosystem Impact

Owning NFTs doesn’t equate to advancing Linea’s growth. Real value comes from actions such as liquidity provision, governance participation, and ecosystem building. Rewarding NFT holders diverts resources from individuals and groups who are genuinely driving the network forward.

Rewarding NFTs Encourages Free-Riding Behavior
Allocating significant rewards to NFT holders promotes a system where people can “buy in” for benefits instead of putting in actual work. This not only disincentivizes meaningful participation but also dilutes the value of real contributions made by the community.

Privilege for the Few, Not the Many

The majority of these NFTs are concentrated in the hands of a few wallets, typically owned by influencers and insiders. Rewarding NFT holders disproportionately risks creating an elitist system where benefits are unfairly skewed toward a privileged minority, neglecting the broader community that has been the backbone of Linea’s success.

Genuine Concerns for a Fair Ecosystem

It’s not about excluding anyone it’s about maintaining balance. Speculative holders should not be completely ignored but should receive minimal multipliers compared to those who actively contribute.

NFT Ownership Does Not Equate to Ecosystem Utility

Unlike actions such as staking, governance participation, or liquidity provision, holding an NFT does not directly contribute to the network’s growth or utility. Rewarding NFT holders with high allocations is an unjustifiable diversion of resources away from community members whose efforts align with Linea’s mission and values.

Exacerbation of Wealth Disparities

NFT rewards or multipliers predominantly benefit well-capitalized actors who can afford to speculate on NFTs. This creates a “rich get richer” dynamic, directly contradicting the ethos of decentralization, which aims to empower smaller participants and foster equality within the ecosystem.

A Call for Fairness: Reward Effort, Not Privilege

The community should focus on recognizing contributions that truly strengthen the ecosystem, such as LXP and LLXP participation. NFT holders should receive no or the least multipliers to ensure a fair and inclusive rewards system that values effort, merit, and meaningful engagement over speculation or privilege.

This approach ensures that the rewards reflect genuine contributions, fostering long-term trust and growth for the Linea community.

1 Like

A separate pool should be given to the project as efrog and not to the efrog nft holders.

And then the project should distribute the tokens individually. As it was the case with many other L2s.

Not every frog nft holder is a programmer, influencer and is involved in efrogs activities. There are also those who only bought speculative nfts.

2 Likes

It’s true that not every NFT holder is actively involved in the NFT project, with many simply holding for potential profit. The project itself deserves recognition, but any rewards or allocations should be based on tangible actions and real engagement with the ecosystem, rather than ownership of an NFT.

1 Like

Keep calm bro . :))

2 Likes

The linea team know OG meaning better than us. so keep calm :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Oh my gosh, they’re absolutely losing it. This is pure chaos. Dude, sharing your opinion on a forum is not the same as aggressively forcing it with a “THIS IS HOW IT MUST BE” attitude. You’ve been heard already. Chill out. This forum is turning into a dumpster of negativity thanks to you.

5 Likes

Sharing strong views isn’t chaos, and advocating for fairness isn’t “forcing” anything it’s engaging in the dialogue this forum is meant forr.

If my opinions have been heard, that’s great, but hearing isn’t the same as addressing them. Instead of resorting to exaggerated reactions, how about sticking to the actual topic? Constructive debates solve issues, not dismissive remarks or attempts to shut others down.

1 Like

0 constructiveness, one substitution of concepts, value judgments issued under the sauce of justice and decency. Fantasies issued under the sauce of truth.

Stop putting yourself above others, guy. This is a forum, not your personal blog.

1 Like

If I remember correctly, almost all networks have OG collections and these people are allocated a share of the prize.
If this doesn’t happen, that’s fine, but if it does, it will make us happy.