Prioritize Fairness, Not Privilege: Least or No Multipliers of $LINEA for so called "Community NFT" holders. Here’s why

“No Room for Privilege: Least or No Multipliers for NFT Holders”

Rewarding NFT holders with high multipliers or allocations is not only unjustified but also harmful to the broader Linea community. Here’s why:

NFTs Reflect Speculation, Not Contribution

Projects like eFrogs, Efroglets, Toad the Great, BlitzBotz, Bunny Universe, and Beaver Builder are predominantly owned by influencers and insiders. These NFTs contribute nothing meaningful to advancing Linea’s ecosystem and are essentially speculative assets. Rewarding these holders prioritizes hype over real utility and contribution.

Undermining the Effort Behind LXP and LLXP Points

While countless community members have worked tirelessly to earn LXP and LLXP points through active engagement and contributions to the network, NFT holders are demanding high rewards for simply owning speculative digital assets. This imbalance undermines the real efforts of those who have consistently supported the ecosystem’s growth.

Rewarding NFTs Encourages Free-Riding Behavior

Allocating significant rewards to NFT holders incentivizes people to “buy in” for benefits rather than putting in real work. This approach disincentivizes meaningful participation and devalues the true contributions that have been made by the community to help grow the network.

NFTs Hold Minimal Ecosystem Value

Owning NFTs has no tangible impact on Linea’s growth, unlike liquidity provision, governance participation, or ecosystem-building efforts. Rewarding NFT holders diverts resources from contributors who are genuinely advancing the network and making a real difference.

NFT Multipliers Serve the Few, Not the Many

The majority of NFTs are concentrated in a few wallets, often owned by influencers and insiders. By rewarding NFT holders, Linea risks creating an elitist system where benefits are funneled to a small, privileged group, rather than fairly distributing rewards to the true contributors within the community.

The Verdict: Focus on Real Contributors, Not Speculators

NFT holders should receive no or the least multipliers, as they add no real value to the ecosystem. Rewards should prioritize actions and contributions that truly support Linea’s growth, ensuring that allocations are based on real effort and meaningful participation.


“Big chunks of rewards for NFT holders are an insult in the face to the entire Linea community, rewarding privileged insiders and speculators while completely undermining the dedication, hard work, and genuine contributions of those who have invested time and effort into advancing the network and earning their LXP and LLXP points.”

7 Likes

Just 2015 efrog 1610 holders :smiley: How selfish and arrogant you are.The owners of the Linea og nft collection deserve a good reward.even though it was not promised to them.

3 Likes

It’s selfish and arrogant to suggest that NFT holders, who already benefit from hype and exclusivity, should be prioritized over thousands of community members who earned LXP and LLXP points through real work. The ecosystem’s growth wasn’t driven by NFTs; it was driven by contributors, builders, and participants who dedicated time and effort.

Linea’s rewards should be about fairness and contribution—not entitlement or insider privilege.

1 Like

If you’re not aware of how much Efrogs contributes and engages within the Linea ecosystem, then allow me to say that you’re just someone with multi wallets just farming LXPs and then shutting down your device you’re not truly involved in Linea and your words prove that

8 Likes

LOL.Bro he probably doesn’t know anything inside Linea :smiley: He just did lxp farming and wants the worlds.LOL

2 Likes

Another clueless attack on communities that live, yes, live, deep in the ecosystem.

This question has already been dissected down to the smallest details in other identical threads.

Author, please tell us a bit about yourself. Share what value you bring after the LXP and LXP-L farming season. What do you do? What are you building in Linea? Who are your friends in the community? Who knows you? How do you enjoy spending your time in the ecosystem?

These are rhetorical questions, and I don’t actually need answers to them.

To the community: it’s long overdue to start ignoring such threads. There are hundreds of times more airdrop hunters than people who genuinely live and breathe the ecosystem, and you’re not going to convince those who tirelessly push their agendas day after day. Do a quick surface-level research, and you’ll see the enthusiasm with which they encourage each other to keep lobbying their interests in chats.

Nothing new here. Zero. Once again, they’re comparing LXP and NFTs but not considering contributions to the community or the ecosystem. They fail to grasp that blockchain is transparent, and if desired, it’s possible to reward truly loyal holders and contributors. But they don’t care about that—they’re not here for it.

They’re here to increase the share of rewards for their hundreds of accounts. So, let’s give them a “gift” by implementing truly strict filtering to send the automators and abusers straight to Valhalla. That would be 100 times more effective (they’re not great at math anyway).

8 Likes

If you think holding an eFrog NFT equals significant contribution to Linea, then you’re the one out of touch. Let’s be real of these NFTs are concentrated in the hands of influencers and insiders, and their so-called ‘engagement’ is nothing more than self-serving hype to pump their own bags.

Accusing others of multi-wallet farming while conveniently ignoring the privileged hoarding of eFrogs is hypocrisy at its finest. Those earning LXP and LLXP points have put in genuine effort through active participation something NFT holders can’t claim just by sitting on speculative assets.

Your argument proves exactly why rewards must be based on real actions, not entitlement or baseless accusations. Linea deserves better than catering to NFT elitism.

LOL. Calling dedicated contributors ‘LXP farmers’ while demanding rewards for sitting on speculative NFTs is laughable. Linea rewards should go to real efforts, not baseless entitlement

Another classic attempt to sideline valid concerns with rhetorical posturing. Instead of addressing the clear disparity in rewarding speculative NFT holders over genuine contributors, you deflect with vague accusations and loaded questions.

Let’s be clear. Earning LXP and LLXP points reflects consistent effort, active engagement, and real value brought to Linea. NFTs, on the other hand, largely represent speculative assets concentrated in privileged hands. The community knows who truly builds and contributes to the ecosystem, and hiding behind buzzwords like “living in the ecosystem” doesn’t change the facts.

If transparency is the goal, let’s reward real contributors, not speculative holders or influencers lobbying for disproportionate benefits. Strict filtering is welcome. Those genuinely engaged have nothing to fear.

It is none of your business who the team will reward :smiley: Please let me know if there is a definite promise made to you in this regard.

2 Likes

i think you dont know what is OG mean

OG is key

efrog is OG pfp on linea

join us before too late :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Instead of these talks

you can join efrog community

before too late

1 Like

hello my friend. How many multi accounts do you have?

3 Likes

The issue with the author of this post is that he’s against any kind of community within Linea.

For him, the communities that formed and are having fun on the Linea network should be excluded from everything. Yet, these are communities that were born on Linea and live exclusively on Linea.

However, I can’t find a single post from the author on the various forums about the zkSync airdrop, or LayerZero distributing rewards to holders of Pudgy Penguins, or the dozens of collections on Berachain like HoneyComb that are set to grant tokens, Bad Kids giving airdrops across the entire Cosmos ecosystem, Azuki, Doodles… do I need to go on?

There’s no insider trading in the NFT collection ecosystem on Linea: everything was launched in a fair manner. But you need to be involved on the community to be aware :slight_smile:

Not helping or rewarding communities, especially those that were created and live exclusively within the ecosystem, shows a profound lack of understanding of how to build and sustain an ecosystem.

Sadly, your opinion is far removed from the growth realities of an ecosystem, not to mention it’s selfish as hell: “Give me all the tokens, I did the LXP tasks, I deserve them.”

My little hypothesis: I bet you only made transactions during the LXP campaigns and were inactive every other day of the year. (sic)

3 Likes

It absolutely is the community’s business when rewards are meant to reflect genuine contributions to the ecosystem. Favoring speculative NFT holders over active contributors undermines fairness and the very principles Linea claims to uphold.

Being ‘OG’ doesn’t automatically equate to meaningful contributions. Titles like OG are meaningless if they don’t translate into real value for the ecosystem.

Effort, engagement, and actual contributions are what should be rewarded not simply holding a profile picture. If your only argument is status and not substance, it’s no wonder there’s resistance.

As for joining, I’d rather stand for fairness and transparency than chase clout under the guise of being OG.

Let me be clear. I am not against communities, but I strongly disagree with prioritizing speculative assets over real contributions.

Bringing up zkSync, LayerZero, or Berachain is just a weak attempt to deflect. What happens in those ecosystems has nothing to do with Linea. This discussion is about ensuring fairness and rewarding the people who genuinely contribute, not giving preferential treatment to NFT holders riding on hype.

The issue is not how these NFTs were distributed initially but how they are now concentrated in a few hands demanding oversized rewards. Calling it a community is a stretch when the supply is so low it barely qualifies as one. This is not fairness; it is entitlement wrapped in exclusivity. :grinning:

The assumptions about me are irrelevant and frankly desperate. The real question is this. Why should those who have put in the work, actively contributed, and genuinely supported Linea’s growth be shoved aside in favor of speculative NFT holders.

Likee wise i can also say,

Rewarding hype and exclusivity over actual effort is a lazy and shortsighted approach that does nothing to build a sustainable ecosystem. But sure, keep pushing for NFT rewards. It almost feels like someone missed the chance to farm LXP early on because they did not think it was worth the effort and now want to compensate by riding the NFT hype train.

Dude, every time you open your mouth, you’re literally spewing fakes and fantasies. Blockchain is transparent, and the team can easily analyze and find ways to reward everyone based on their contributions and merits. It’s absolutely clear that some unique activities require extreme involvement or financial expenses. You could’ve been active, tracked the Linea ecosystem, owned all possible NFTs, and been a part of the community - but you didn’t. Now, when it’s time for FOMO and greed, you’re shaking and spreading negativity. Your motivation is obvious and crystal clear - there are many like you.

The Linea team has the resources and an open, book-like blockchain to analyze the activity of each holder of certain NFTs or tokens. The Linea team itself is highly engaged and knows the community members, their accounts, Twitter, Telegram, Discord, and even in real life. We are literally building this network together.

Your worldview, however, is limited to a single point - airdrop. You see nothing else in this adventure. Even now, in these days, several NFT collection sales took place - you could’ve flipped, become a holder, or joined the vibe of a new community. But you’re not interested in that, just like you’re not interested in Linea as a whole.

Even your goal on this forum is false because it won’t lead you to any result. You’re trying to cut off people who will get a share of the supply (inspired by your favorite bloggers with their airdrop allocation calculators), but you don’t understand that the real fight should be against automators and abusers, not the community. You should battle your own foolishness and greed instead.

Take a break. Tell us about yourself, show us your Twitter/Discord/Telegram. Maybe you’re a builder or bringing some valuable ideas to this network? We’d be happy to interact with you.

9 Likes

Saying this is basically proving you know nothing about Linea and its ecosystem except monotonic farming. All these NFT communities are the only parties creating organic engagement on Twitter and other socials. There are only 2015 Eforgs NFTs, creating the real value in the network, and you’re still worried about additional 30$ that you may receive if frog holders receive nothing. It’s funny, mate. I hope there will be less people like you after tge, selfish energy

Look at your topic and opinions written here. You’re the only one arguing NFT communities aren’t good enough to be rewarded

4 Likes

It’s not about quantity. All they do is diminish someone else’s value because they have nothing to say about their own. They might make up some nonsense, but they’re incapable of realizing that their motives are as clear as day.

3 Likes