Proposal for Fair and Inclusive Token Distribution: Prioritizing On-Chain Activity Over Specific NFT Multipliers

[paperlesshash]

I agree and even I raised concerns.

here are links

Prioritize Fairness, Not Privilege: Least or No Multipliers of $LINEA for so called "Community NFT" holders. Here’s why

“No Room for Privilege: Least or No Multipliers for NFT Holders” Rewarding NFT holders with high multipliers or allocations is not only unjustified but also harmful to the broader Linea community. Here’s why: NFTs Reflect Speculation, Not Contribution Projects like eFrogs, Efroglets, Toad the Great, BlitzBotz, Bunny Universe, and Beaver Builder are predominantly owned by influencers and insiders. These NFTs contribute nothing meaningful to advancing Linea’s ecosystem and are essentially specul…

End the Privilege Game: Prioritize Merit, Not Hype: NFTs Shouldn’t Overshadow Contributors

Rewarding NFT holders with significant multipliers AS SUGGESTED IN FEW TOKEN DESIGN is a misguided and unfair approach that undermines the values of equity and genuine long term contribution within the Linea ecosystem. Here’s a breakdown of why this approach fails: Promoting Free-Riding Over Participation Allocating significant rewards to NFT holders encourages passive “buy-in” behavior. Why contribute to the ecosystem when holding an NFT alone becomes a shortcut to large rewards? This appr…

Against the Proposed Tiered Airdrop Model by Community: Are We Letting Greed Decide Linea’s Airdrop Allocation?

Why Greed Shouldn’t Shape Linea’s Airdrop Strategy Are We Letting Greed Decide Linea’s Airdrop Allocation? The current narrative pushing for 16+ points and beyond as thresholds for top-tier allocations is fundamentally flawed and raises significant concerns about fairness, inclusivity, and the values of the Linea community. Here’s why this approach is problematic: 1. 8-9K LXP Points: The Realistic Maximum for Most Participants Campaign Limits: Completing 100% of tasks and quests during L…