I was browsing the forum and noticed a lot of discussions from various perspectives. Some individuals argue that NFTs or similar assets should not be considered, while others believe that users with LXP-L should receive minimal rewards. Another group advocates considering only LXP, while some criticize those who focus solely on LXP as being indicative of sybil behavior.
After spending some time reading these discussions, I came across a variety of viewpoints. However, the one suggestion that I personally find reasonable is the idea of implementing a tiered system, such as levels ranging from 1 to 5. It is important to note that such a system should not rely solely on LXP as the determining factor for a user’s tier and, consequently, their eligibility for better rewards or airdrops.
For example, a user with a specific amount of LXP can earn a certain number of points. Likewise, holding a certain amount of LXP-L can contribute additional points. In addition to these metrics, other factors such as consistent network usage on a daily or weekly basis over several months should also be rewarded with points. This would ensure that active participation and meaningful engagement with the ecosystem are recognized.
In my opinion, NFTs such as eFrogs should also earn a significant amount of points to holders. Other NFTs or contributions could also earn proportional points. The key is to take a holistic approach where eligibility for rewards, such as the Linea airdrop, is determined by a combination of multiple factors rather than just the aggregation of a specific metric. This comprehensive structure would better reflect the diversity and engagement of the community.
Here is my perspective on the matter.