It’s disappointing to see how my post was flagged simply for offering a perspective that challenges the status quo. The community’s decision to hide my post only highlights how certain viewpoints are silenced when they don’t align with popular opinion.
My message wasn’t spam or promotional it was an honest discussion about the unfair advantages given to NFT holders, and the community response was nothing more than an attempt to shut down any criticism. It’s clear that some prefer to silence dissent rather than engage with differing opinions.
If every post that questions the system is flagged just because it doesn’t conform to the majority view, how can Linea grow into an ecosystem that values transparency and fairness?
If you truly believe in the value of honest dialogue, it’s time to stop hiding opposing views and start fostering discussions that lead to meaningful change.
Your post was flagged because you posted links to your topic in the comments of other topics. This is obviously not a good idea. The list of active discussions is on the main page.
The rest of what you wrote is uncommented. This is funny
– update cause the topic was closed –
I clarified the reason why the post was marked, it has a direct relation to the topic, because in the topic title and text, the author provided false information and I believe that this can mislead users. I completely agree with the rules.
@paperlesshash@yuriib you are free to discuss your thoughts and opinions about token design here on the forum but please remain respectful to each other and keep discussions on-topic.
There is no need for back and forth conversation unrelated to the topic that deters away from the discussion please.
