In the berachain or pudgy penguins projects, the idea of gathering communities was mainly based on owning nft. The entire community is focused around them.
It’s different with linea, here from the beginning the goal was to interact with the blockchain and gradually gain lxp.
The core of the community was lxp. This is an indisputable matter.
It is not appropriate to call the tedious lxp savers farmers.
These are really people who have made a significant impact on the ecosystem.
You see lxp, or more precisely its amount, can say a lot about a specific wallet, about its contribution to the development of the network. Was the one with 2k lxp as involved as the one with 8-9k?
No, it wasn’t.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about EFrogs holders. How can you tell whether one nft holder was as involved as the other, or maybe less or more? It is impossible.
And nft itself and specifically its current price is speculation. Alpha nft in ath was also worth $700…
Someone is abusing the term OG in relation to owners of efrogs nft.
Of course there are those among them who are really involved but they are a definite minority.
Complete nonsense. How can you write about this without being part of the community? Most users are present across all messengers and networks and are in constant contact with each other and the Linea team. I haven’t seen you anywhere in the ecosystem, nor any of the other attackers. Coincidence?
Another fake and nonsense in your authorship. On the first day the price was 10x, on the second day 40x, on ATH we were around 0.56ETH before the summer. Then there were price fluctuations with a fall to an average of 0.2. Again you are talking about something you don’t know.
I completely agree with you on this. What do the community and NFTs have to do with each other? NFTs and the community are a bonus, a separate path. It’s obvious you haven’t attended a single AMA; otherwise, you would understand the role of the community and Linea’s positioning. Once again, let me remind you that any community within Linea predominantly consists of the most active participants in the LXP and LXP-L campaigns, as well as on-chain and off-chain events. Many of us even know each other personally, having met at events and conferences.
[quote=“Seia, post:23, topic:8821”]
In the berachain or pudgy penguins projects, the idea of gathering communities was mainly based on owning nft. The entire community is focused around them.
It’s different with linea.[/quote]
Once again, you’re presenting your wishes as reality. Linea didn’t stop at LXP. If you were an active participant in the ecosystem, you would know the efforts Linea has put into developing the community and activities within the ecosystem, and how crucial the role of the OG community has been along the way. Once again, you’re out of the loop on the news, events, and positioning of Linea because you simply haven’t cared to follow it.
Now, you’re wasting people’s time for what? So that an NFT holder doesn’t get their bonus? And what’s in it for you? Won’t your greed be weighed down by the fact that you missed all these activities?
Dude, realize that the LXP program is inherently motivational. Completing it didn’t mean Linea’s life ended; it provided the opportunity for organic network building and interaction with a community that wants to live within this network. It was and still is not the only program.
LXP is where it all started, but it might be a revelation for you that beyond the obvious activities, where you were guided step by step like an instruction manual, there was life in the network. Communities were forming, and they were the first to help build the ecosystem and bring it to life.
Why are you scared of the idea of a big reward? Why does the thought of a new blue-chip star shining in the blockchain scare you?
Don’t you realize that this fact alone will attract a bunch of degens, who will jump on the FOMO train to flood the ecosystem, buying memes and flipping NFTs? Even now, this train lets people happily and profitably flip NFTs and trade meme coins.
eFrogs is catastrophically undervalued, and the worst thing Linea could do is start listening to haters and envious people on this matter - in other words, undervaluing it themselves.
Oh no, dude, don’t even worry about that. The team is made up of far from silly people, and I believe they understand the value of the community. They won’t spit in the heart of the community just because of a series of sabotaging posts from a few authors with a bunch of accounts.
It’s pointless to respond to this. They’ll never admit to their lies and will just continue creating new manipulations. Don’t waste your time on it. This has already been discussed multiple times in other topics. And what? They keep bringing up the same broken record, completely ignoring how their arguments fall apart.
It’s amusing how you equate creating memes on Twitter with building a sustainable ecosystem. Organic engagement is valuable, sure, but it doesn’t hold a candle to the actual work done by contributors who build, test, and engage in meaningful ways to grow Linea. If you think 2,015 NFTs represent the backbone of the ecosystem, you might need to reevaluate what real value means.
And let’s not pretend this is about $30 it’s about ensuring fairness and recognizing those who genuinely contribute, not just those who bought into speculative assets. If prioritizing meaningful contributions over hype comes across as “selfish energy,” then so be it. The real selfishness is expecting oversized rewards for holding an asset that adds little beyond temporary noise.
The fact that you’re so defensive about NFT communities being questioned speaks volumes. Critiquing the allocation strategy doesn’t mean dismissing communities; it means advocating for balanced rewards that support Linea’s long-term growth. If that’s too much to grasp, perhaps it’s time to focus less on who’s arguing and more on what’s being argued
Ignoring valid criticism is exactly why ecosystems stagnate. Labeling genuine concerns as “waging war” is just an easy way to dodge accountability. Communities thrive on constructive dialogue, not blind praise or entitlement. Instead of dismissing differing opinions, maybe it’s time to address the real issues like ensuring fairness in reward distribution so that Linea grows stronger for everyone, not just a select few.
Dismissing concerns as “manipulations” without offering a proper counterargument only reveals a lack of substance. If the points are so flawed, it should be easy to refute them directly. Repeating the same dismissive rhetoric doesn’t strengthen your case; it just avoids the conversation altogether. Engaging with facts, not avoidance, is how real discussions are moved forward.
If the team truly values the community, they’ll reward contributions that genuinely drive the ecosystem forward, not speculative hype masquerading as “community.” Sabotage? Hardly. Highlighting concerns about fairness and sustainability is not sabotage; it’s ensuring Linea grows on solid ground, not inflated narratives. But hey, if accountability feels like a threat, maybe it’s time to reevaluate what “community” really means.
Scared? Hardly. The real question is, why are you so insistent on inflating speculative assets at the expense of real contributors? If your “blue-chip star” is built on meme flipping and FOMO, it is not a star it is a bubble. Sure, degens might flood in, but they will leave just as quickly, chasing the next shiny thing, leaving the ecosystem to clean up the mess.
Linea’s strength lies in genuine builders, not hype chasers. Overvaluing assets like eFrogs, which bring little to no functional value, risks undermining the ecosystem’s long-term credibility. Rewarding speculation over substance is not just shortsighted it is destructive. Let’s focus on sustainable growth instead of creating a playground for profiteers.
Your attempt to position yourself as neutral while advocating for NFT holders is noted, but let’s address the real issue here. The problem is not with acknowledging contributors; it is with conflating speculative NFT ownership with actual ecosystem contributions.
“Balance and fairness” sound great on paper, but in practice, how do you measure engagement from an NFT holder versus someone who has been consistently active in the ecosystem, completing LXP and LLXP tasks? NFTs are speculative by nature and cannot accurately represent consistent participation or effort.
If NFT holders have truly contributed, their efforts should be recognized through the same metrics as everyone else, not via blanket rewards tied to asset ownership. Creating a special category for NFTs risks undermining fairness by disproportionately benefiting a subset of users based on speculative investments rather than tangible contributions.
Strange…your post reeks of greed and supposedly you don’t own a nft?
Never mind,I don’t want to take part in any verbal “pushing”.
Time will tell,and the WHOLE community will judge whether Linea will be fully transparent and fair as it is until today.
Finally, I would like to quote the words from the official Mirror Linea:
What are Linea Voyage XP (LXP)?
Voyage XP are non-transferable soulbound tokens distributed to recognize the community’s extraordinary contribution toward the growth of the Linea ecosystem. Whether you are a user, a startup, a dapp, or a member of the Linea team, this token will recognize and validate your commitment to Linea’s growth.
Dude, you’re making up fakes and calling on others to believe them. Join the community, check out the progress made (yes, there’s a visualization for it), and then try saying anything about speculative assets.
I’m sure everyone, including myself, is tired of these messages—nothing but greed, lies, anger, and aggression.
Learn about Linea, and you’ll realize that the community will keep growing, there will be more NFTs, and there will be even more activities.
Were you guys crying about LXP being bad and that it should end? Well, it’s over. Life didn’t stop there.
Dude, that’s exactly what you do here all the time. I don’t have eFrogs, so what’s weird about that?
Dude, refresh your knowledge and follow Linea. The train has long moved on. At the same time, no one is dismissing LXP. Stop twisting facts and manipulating.
ahahahahaha, are you serious? and who is this, you? even in your mentioned twitter there is nothing about the ecosystem, except for meager posts that concern drophunt
