there are topics on this already, if you believe you have a valid reason , why don’t you jump into the conversation and come up with logical arguments why you are against it instead of being jealous of people that have put in hard work and trying to provide a fair solution for the airdrop?
Please do not spam the forum by creating new posts dictating the same thing, Only makes it hard to navigate.
- Have any objection to an idea? you can reply to the posts directly
- If you have your own suggestion on the Token Design, post it in detail
12 Likes
jecabroz has already outlined the whole idea, which is stretched out over a month and a lot of messages and topics
if the team adds a dislike feature to the forum thats thanks to you bro 
thank you for your contributions to the Linea
5 Likes
If standing up for fairness and pointing out obvious disparities is “causing controversy,” then so be it. It’s not about drama—it’s about ensuring everyone’s voice is heard and the system is equitable. Instead of dismissing concerns with personal jabs, let’s focus on the real issue: creating a reward model that benefits the entire community, not just a select few.
Interesting take, but let’s set the record straight. Advocating for fairness and inclusivity isn’t about “playing boss”—it’s about ensuring the system works for everyone, not just a privileged few. Dismissing concerns as “twisting narratives” doesn’t change the fact that disproportionate rewards harm the community more than they help.
Why do you take it on yourself? Post was never about you until and unless if you know.
Calling my concerns “nonsense” or “fakes” doesn’t make them any less valid. If you’re resorting to labeling genuine points as hysteria, it’s clear the actual issue is being dodged. Fairness is not pseudo—it’s about addressing the glaring disparity in token allocation, which disproportionately favors a select few.
Flagging concerns as duplicates or spam is just another way to silence criticism instead of engaging with it. If your arguments were solid, you wouldn’t need to rely on dismissive tactics. Let’s focus on the real issue: ensuring an equitable and transparent system that rewards genuine participation without bias.
Who are “we”? The people advocating for fairness, not just favoritism. If addressing disparities and advocating for balanced rewards feels like “spamming” to you, maybe that says more about your unwillingness to engage with real issues than it does about my points.
Addressing unfair token allocation, the disparity in reward systems, and the role of Testnet NFTs are not the same thing—they require nuanced discussion. Simply responding to unrelated posts would bury these issues in a sea of replies, making it harder for others to engage meaningfully.
If the idea has been stretched out over a month with numerous messages and topics, that only highlights how many critical gaps remain unaddressed. Discussions should remain dynamic and inclusive, not treated as closed just because one person has outlined their version. This is about ensuring all voices are heard and fairness is truly achieved, not about rubber-stamping what’s already been said.
If a dislike feature gets added, it’ll only highlight how uncomfortable some people are with genuine discussions about fairness and equity. Dismissing valid concerns with sarcasm won’t change the facts—imbalanced token allocation and favoritism harm the community far more than open debate ever could.
But hey, if sparking meaningful conversations inspires change, even in the form of a dislike button, I’ll take it as proof that the issues I’m raising can’t just be ignored. Thanks for confirming my contributions are making waves—whether you like it or not.
1 Like
If pushing for fairness for the 95% who are often ignored sounds repetitive, it’s because the issue is that significant and needs constant attention. It’s easy to laugh off when you’re part of the privileged few benefiting from the current system, but real fairness isn’t about protecting the 5% at the top—it’s about ensuring everyone gets their due.
FYI even I bought and hold FROG NFT. 
I’m not against the idea of rewarding hard work, but the issue lies in the disproportionate rewards being suggested based purely on LXP holdings and top-tier NFTs. It’s not about being “jealous”—it’s about ensuring a fairer distribution that takes into account genuine contributions and participation, not just what someone can hold or buy.
The logic I’m presenting is simple: those who have invested significant time and effort into the community, regardless of their holdings, deserve recognition and a fair shot at rewards. A system that favors quantity over quality of involvement doesn’t reflect true fairness. I’m advocating for a solution that is inclusive of all efforts, not just the few with the largest holdings.
Ah, I see—fairness only matters when it benefits paperlesshash, right? Anything else is automatically “unfair,” as long as his interests are protected. How convenient! It’s almost impressive how a single person’s tantrums can set the entire tone for what’s deemed “fair.” Maybe one day the world will realize that true fairness isn’t about one individual crying until they get their way. Until then, keep fighting those imaginary injustices—I’m sure it’s working wonders.
Ugh, stop this circus. Who are you putting on this clown show for? It’s all clear with you. You’re a retrodropper, and an automator at that.
4 Likes
Well, the clowning continues
3 Likes
Lol, this guy’s churning out replies with CHATGPT. Who are you even trying to reason with?
Ignore him. He’s just a typical manipulator, not worth a second of your attention. Focus on other topics instead.
3 Likes
I don’t have time to read the garbage you spam on the forum. Even if you repeat the same thing 500 times, it will not become something meaningful and good. Your proposals have nothing to do with honesty and fairness. You are a manipulator and a chatterbox.
You substitute concepts and hide behind integrity, but people here are far from stupid and see right through you.
2 Likes
I think there won’t be anything better in this thread.
The author talks about eternal important things like justice and applies them to false attributes under loud fake headlines. I’ve seen this behavior in any project discord/twitter before TGE. It’s obvious that Linea won’t make a mistake and won’t offend its most loyal users in response to shouting and manipulation.
3 Likes
No matter how many times you spew it, it won’t change the fact that your proposals are far from honest or fair. You’re just manipulating the narrative while hiding behind a false sense of integrity.