The circus is still running, I see. Keep putting on your show, but we all know it’s just a distraction. It’s obvious what you’re trying to do, and no amount of drama will change that.
It’s clear, alright. You’re just mad because you can’t control the game anymore. Call me a retrodropper or automator all you want it doesn’t change the fact that you’re scrambling to cover up your own intentions.
1 Like
Lol, keep deluding yourself. You can try to discredit my replies all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you’re just dodging the real conversation. Keep ignoring the truth; it’s only making you look more desperate.
1 Like
Dude, I’ve been watching your “real conversation” from the start and live. You discredited yourself with your behavior and aggression, and now when you receive it in response from the participants, you are surprised. You don’t listen to anyone’s opinion and keep spamming the same lines like a degen. The guy above already said it - behind your loud headlines is just a greedy, selfish, and aggressive shill. Chill out, we know who you are and what you’re up to.
4 Likes
The funniest thing is that this dude is flagging posts that add important context about him and his motivations. The same guy who wrote a whole post about how he was unfairly flagged. My God, what cringe. That’s an impact on Linea, bravo dude.
2 Likes
Fair is whatever benefits paperlesshash.
Anything that rewards others significantly more than paperlesshash? Totally unfair.
If the reward is just $1 more than his, he might tolerate it without throwing a tantrum.
But the drama will go on until Linea caves to his ultimatum and falls for his manipulative antics.
1 Like
Fair is whatever benefits paperlesshash.
Anything that rewards others significantly more than paperlesshash? Totally unfair.
If the reward is just $1 more than his, he might tolerate it without throwing a tantrum.
But the drama will go on until Linea caves to his ultimatum and falls for his manipulative antics.
1 Like
Fair is whatever benefits paperlesshash.
Anything that rewards others significantly more than paperlesshash? Totally unfair.
If the reward is just $1 more than his, he might tolerate it without throwing a tantrum.
But the drama will go on until Linea caves to his ultimatum and falls for his manipulative antics.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and as any of you are free to share yours, so are others.
Please respect each other and conduct discussions in a civil manner.
This topic has been turning into a flame. I will keep my eye on it from now on. Don’t continue on this path.
4 Likes
I have never seen a more greedy set of people than those in Web3. Linea already gave you an opportunity to acquire points by buying NFTs. Some bought as much as 10 even more. Left everyone who could not afford to buy an NFT in the dust.
Yet you still want the team to remove people who acquire their points legitimately because they do not meet a certain threshold?
So the chain is meant to be used only by those people well resourced to buy NFTs or participate in a 2 year campaign ?
If linea wants adoption, removing lower LXP holders is not the route.
Remove sybils yes.
Remove wallets with very limited onchain activity yes.
Give bonuses based on early usage because gas was more expensive yes.
Give bonuses based on continued usage long after the campaign yes.
But removing people because they are not fully vested here yet participated in some form … Well Linea will end up with a Ghost chain the same way ZKsync struggled after the airdrop. All the people who got the largest airdrops moved their new found liquidity elsewhere.
1 Like
This isn’t greed. it’s an obvious pattern. People who spent a year and a half investing their time, effort, nerves, and money into the early phases shouldn’t be devalued by those who came to Linea Park under the cheerful chants of guides pushing topics like “Spend $3 in Linea Park and get a $1500 drop.” You took the risk? Bear the weight of your risks.
The idea behind LXP is Proof of Work. If you have little LXP, it means you didn’t work hard enough.
A great example is Polyhedra, which gave a minimal drop to those who didn’t meet the entry threshold. That’s reasonable and as fair as it gets.
Very cheap manipulation.
4 Likes
So now it’s about “removing” people who earned points legitimately? Let’s be clear: being able to buy 10 NFTs doesn’t equal hard work or contribution. It’s about making sure rewards actually go to those who build the ecosystem—not just those who can throw money at it.
You want adoption? Reward actual engagement, not just deep pockets. Sybils, low activity wallets, and speculators should be filtered out. Everyone deserves a chance, but let’s not pretend that handing out rewards to passive holders is what will drive long-term success. Linea needs real users, not ghost chains full of one-time wallet flippers.
let’s get one thing straight: fairness isn’t about inflating someone’s rewards just because they feel entitled to it. It’s about ensuring that the people who actually contribute, not just hold assets, are the ones driving the ecosystem forward.
And no, it’s not an ultimatum just a call for a more balanced, sustainable system. If Linea wants long-term success, it can’t reward speculation over actual participation. If that’s “manipulative,” then so be it. But this is about building a system that benefits everyone, not just the ones holding the biggest bag.
If you can’t handle a different perspective without throwing around insults, maybe you’re the one who’s getting caught up in the noise. I’m here for a real conversation, not the same tired attacks. Keep pretending it’s all about me, but I’m just calling out the flaws that are pretty clear to anyone paying attention.
Dude, get well soon, such pathological idiocy is already causing concern. They took and copied this text to ridicule you, but of course you ridicule yourself even more with your behavior.
Deflection and projection the last refuge when there’s nothing real to say. If exposing the truth hits you this hard, maybe it’s not me you should be worried about. Keep spiraling, it’s entertaining.
Whats unfair acc. to you the tiered system or some eligibilty for points?