The whole post is wood language.
You have not argued a single bit why a user that spent hours + xxx$ in fees to get over 6k lxp shoud be in the same tier as one who just bought a frog nft.
“because you didn’t even attempt to approach the matter fairly, conduct research (blockchain is an open book accessible to everyone).” have you done any?
“The obvious goal here is to cut off another allocation channel apart from LXP.” If you did even bother to read my post I typed some other examples that team should consider apart from just lxp.
Wood language again.
“From your messages, it’s quite obvious that you came to the forum and immediately started engaging in diversionary tactics.” — have you bother to read the message?
“Not a single word about fighting sybils, not a word about tiers that could shift the balance towards users who burned the most money and endured hardships during the testnet and the fresh network with unstable ecosystem projects” — again you did not bother to read my message, a user who has over 6k lxp is a user who engaged with linea pre decun thus having spent premium $ on gas fees. About sybil I already said that metamask card requires kyc I also don’t see any post from you on how to get rid of sybils.
And somehow I am the one that “act aggressively towards others” just by arguing that having a frog nft and having over 6k lxp should not be consider the same. You gave 0 examples on why a frog and a user with 6k+ lxp should be in the same boat.
Lol, dude, there’s no point explaining anything to you. For you, participating in the network boils down to following instructions to farm LXP. The active community outside of LXP has been around for a long time, and their cumulative hours far exceed those of LXP farmers simply because the community exists 24/7 and participates in ALL network activities - not just the ones incentivized by LXP bonuses. They spend way more money too, having already contributed to various activities, and they’re early adopters/testers in numerous ecosystem projects you’ve never even heard of. These are the people involved in games, events, AMAs, community calls, and so much more - where people like you have never been and still aren’t.
There’s nothing to explain here. You’re not reading, and you’re not trying to understand. If you genuinely wanted to figure things out, you’d spend time analyzing the ecosystem, community, and blockchain. But it’s painfully clear you’re not interested in any of that. With your statements you only once again confirm how far you are from both the community and the ecosystem.
P.S. It’s hilarious that you accuse others of using “wooden language” while relying on ChatGPT yourself.
Please don’t tell him about other categories of people who will also get a drop not for LXP, his farming heart won’t take it. I think he only has enough hate for one community 
Again, have you read anything I typed? I already stated that the team should include other criterias like activity after lxp campaigns so who are you arguing with?
You are just defending that buying a frog nft is equal to spending hours & hundreds of $ on gas fees to get more than 6k lxp without reasoning why.
Scroll up, look where all this started and maybe consider reading 
?
Dude, everyone already knows this, and the team has been addressing it since the end of the LXP campaign. I don’t see why you’re stirring up all this noise.
I’m not defending anything; I simply stated facts that are obvious to anyone familiar with the ecosystem. You’re acting like a foreign agent within it.
All your claims have been answered in this thread, but clearly, you don’t care. Please don’t tag me - I’d rather not engage in a dialogue with you.
Indeed, it seems more important to focus on who calls whom what (and for the record, I didn’t insult anyone - this is a fact, as the screenshot shows a textbook example of foolish behavior driven by greed) than to actually protect the network from predatory manipulations and attacks originating from sybil communities.
Please, guys, lower your tolerance to those who act destructively in their ideas from the very beginning. I heard you, but please hear me too. Thanks.
1 Like
For all NFT collections
I don’t understand your question?
Agree, 0.5 points should be allocated to all NFT collections, not exclusively to eFrogs.
As I can understand same old topic why 5 point for efrog which equals to 6000LXP. Don’t be part of it. I will say both of you guys @blizzard and @Lineamaxi if you read previous massages in beginning I’m also opposed 5 points and told 3 points idle. However, it’s just a proposal and if team decided to give them 5 points you really can’t do anything, just wasting time with arguing eFrog NFT holders.
More important is try to raise voice for remove 10000+ ads browser sybils, when Lxp-L data will be release and make minimum 1500+ LXP with tier based. It will be much more important than fighting against efrog’s bonus Nft holders.
Team will do what they pre-decided. No more argue on this topic. You can politely ask proposal @LeChiffre creator to edit and give Efrog 3 points. If he don’t it’s his personal choice. You can’t force him or argue with whole Efrog community here and make the environment bad. If you have anything to request, on discord there is an option of giving feedback. You can raise voice there. Let’s keep this environment positive.
Well if this is your issue we will suggest to the team to make a special allocation for efrogs separate from LXP 
1 Like
Guys, you’re getting way too carried away with these proposals. Just because your opinion was asked and said to be important doesn’t mean the airdrop will be based on some point system, nor does it mean your numbers will be used, nor that your idea will be taken in its entirety. Some points, some bargaining driven by greed from those who didn’t have the money or sense to buy an NFT. What a circus.
3 Likes
Leave Linea alone, they’ll do everything as it should be.
3 Likes
This Efog NFT airdrop
3 Likes
Less is more
1 Like
I would say we need to reward genuine interest in Linea community.
NFTs OWNERSHIP should not be prioritised - this is basis for speculation.
Instead, MINTING of NFTs should be considered - they were minted by real OGs.
Just my 2 cents 
What’s the issue with speculation? Those who minted, held, and sold have already received their reward. Those who bought created the market, provided rewards for the minters, paid a significantly higher price, took on the risk for greater potential profit, and gained the utility and rights that the NFT provides. The truth is, even in the weakest Linea collections, the percentage of NFTs being sold doesn’t exceed 10%.
Guys, stop making things up and demonizing normal, healthy market mechanics. This is a market, and this is crypto - just accept it already. How much longer will this go on?
1 Like