That’s why gas fees spent come, how many chains that particular wallet activated but not just touching chains with 10$ transaction multiple times and bridging back and forth, before and after Dencun activity counts, how many quests that wallet participated in, whether the wallet participated in Liquidity provision & earned LXP-L, so on. Also, how many wallets are connected with that wallet, should be below 20 or else Sybil.
Most of what you say makes sense and I agree, but why do you discredit yourself by claiming Efrogs holders should get 5 points? That is utterly ridiculous. That means users who participated in several LXP campaigns (6k LXP to get to 5 points) get the same amount of tokens than someone who owns an Efrog NFT? Hell no!! Other than that, thanks for taking the time!
People who have multiple tx’s and contracts are people who use a variety of things, not just holding coins.
its totally unfair
A stupid work. Just made up design to benefit own bag. You have no idea how much real user will miss. I understand you dont have much data. you havnt thought hard enough. USELESS work
Hey @Vyto.linea, please follow the rules and be respectful to everyone here we are open to comments and feedback on the proposal, if you disagree it’s ok, but please be kind and respectful, thanks for understanding
you know the lxp campaigns were a great intro and killer way to gamify the engagement process, also i totally agree that is probably not the best metric by itself .Real protocol interactions, time on chain, across multiple protocols to me looks more like an organic user more likely to remain after tge. anyone with more than a couple wallets should get a fractional allocation per wallet if its over say 5 wallets. lastly i would rather cap large allocations and redirect the difference to lower tier participants, i mean who needs it more Whales or new users?
typical sybil
Lmao. Guys, it seems like you don’t understand at all where you came to and how this works.
good proposal I like Linea Community Forum
Small NFT communities are almost ignored, showing that many accounts are here to farm airdrops, not to start communities. Try looking at Linea communities, almost no one is interested. New NFT projects have less than a thousand participants, but LXP has millions of farmers.
This is why communities will be rewarded as a separate type of participation.
What do you mean by your email? I see it says typical Sybil, if you mean that directed at me, your wrong. But I don’t mind, I was sharing my genuine opinion. What would typical Sybil mean anyway? Like impersonating someone? I’m a pretty low key trader and earning definitely yield for about 6 years, I’m a member of a few dao and genuinely think defi is a great equalizer. You trying to minimize my statement by saying that Sybil thing is not that cool. Kind of the opposite reason this space is great. Peace
Hello, I think it’s worth mentioning those users who brought referrals to the LINEA project, since any project needs a decent and stable community!
How about for creators?
Are they not contributors?
Much better than the LXP army versions, metamask card is to high, efrog is also a bit high.
Is a nice set up but 5 points for efrogs and 3 for metamask is a little excessive.
I think you can add a point for the testnet voyage, it was one of the most hard to earn nfts/campaign out of all Linea voyage.
This guy keeps writing criteria that are truly disrespectful. I think the airdrop should only be based on LXP and LXP - L. Why? Because everything revolves around LXP. You need to understand simply that if someone gets their wallet hacked, they can transfer their LXP to another wallet, and that’s their effort. It’s not like they get their wallet hacked, then create a new one and perform a bunch of transactions and volume. In the end, I think LXP and LXP-L are the two most important things for the Linea airdrop!
The team intend to delay the TGE. They behave like a bunch of children, with no respect for community
It’s over. Sir