where’s equality ? if you propose tvl criteria on weak wallets than it shoud be implemented for all LXP holders, including the top ones
On this forum we discussed it many times, that linear distribution is unappropriate for LXP, so tiers must be implemented. And what’s wrong with playing with Linea from Linea Park ? A guy from week 1 could spend 50$ I said it many times, the ones who could earn cheap LXP are those who came at week 6 only
You say
But at the same time you propose tvl criteria for what reasons? Sybils are rich now, it worth nothing for them to deposit even 500$ on account. You have LXP system, all parameters are priced in the system. From where are you guys coming suggesting balance/volume/txns amount criteria ? We have a point system. Simply introduce threshold on LXP/fees/Dencun transactions and you will get the most fair distribution ever. Why are you always eager to play with untransparent criteria such as balance/volume etc
So accroding to your proposal a guy from top-1k LXP users with Efrogs (~2k$), 2 years of transactions, voyage NFTs etc but holding 80$ during 2 years should receive LXP/5 number of tokens ? Just because a random guy on forum thought it fits well his account(s) ?
And why exactly 50$ or 100$? If you bougt ETH at ath for 100$ and price decreased significantly, it’s your fault ? The person won’t receive fair rewards just because the price on underlying asset has dropped significantly?
You either introduce proposal regarding balance with native token/aggregate across all networks or never publish it, since it’s a pure untransparent criteria which doesn’t target sybils, but only those who see no logic in holding 100$ on chain where fees cost you ~0.05$ per txn.
I dont really think the proposed idea is right
If team wanna reduce rewards, it should be on the people who didnt interact on months that linea didnt give quests .
The best time is Q1 of 2025 as we have tge at end of Q1 . Jan and february is the best time.
If the wallet dont have 5$ in linea eth or eco tokens
No interaction in last month . These are enough .
Coz the community mostly did what linea asked to do nothing beyond .
Nile , lynx voters, Efrogs, foxy , linus is the only community that did something beyond what linea said
Why would they check activity only now? when are network charges equal to 0?
real deserving users struggled with testnet and paid $1-2 for each operation when we launched mainnet, and these are the ones who should get the most.
Joining from LINEA PARK, where the tasks were super simple and the fees were close to zero, shouldn’t help much, because in fact, such users didn’t do much for the network either.
What don’t you like about TVL’s assessment?
If you are not able to keep even $100 online, you probably have many wallets and that is why there is a requirement to eliminate such people.
Naked wallets should be automatically rejected. This filters out farms automatically because they don’t have the money to maintain hundreds of wallets >$100 or even >$50
This I agree with. But the threshold should be low, I think Declan or someone previously stated that they would make it low, and maybe not even .005, and that liquidity would count, but I’m not 100% sure. Including liquidity, a .005 threshold is quite fair imho. And especially if they had like literally nothing, under .001
Wallets with nothing in them anymore is a reasonable reason to reduce rewards.
Having at least ONE transaction after Park also.
Having to have one the last month, no, that is not good, there are plenty of real users that is bound to affect. Zero transactions since Park, very reasonable. Requiring a transaction within the last 30 days, not reasonable at all imo.
People keeping their liquidity in could be a good criterion for a little bonus, especially like the actual liquidity from Surge or any other liquidity they may be providing on the network.
Some tiering as we’ve discussed is also fine.
What I do not agree though with more aggressive criterion or major adjustments.
Or the people I see (not OP just saying I’ve seen) wanting to make something other than LXP the main criterion. Real bad idea.
People want too many aggressive things that will affect many real users.
We should want to be very careful of that, because Linea’s sentiment is already BAD.
Like, VERY bad.
Going on a crusade is the last thing we want at this point, we want the most users the most happy and that is what is going to revive Linea.
Let’s shift our focus to other topics. Better discuss other things. It’s done and dusted. Don’t waste your precious time, better move on. Linea has a history of broken trust and team doesn’t care about community anymore.
If they can’t even share something as simple as a checker, you have to think twice what you are actually expecting from them.
True, you’d think just a checker would be simple enough, I imagine they wanted to work out tokenomics first though and that’s why there has been a delay, so they not only show ppl they qualify but for what.
Its unfortunate that this is how nearly everyone feels at this point though, just defeated, as we have for a whole damn year basically, some for longer that quit when Park was released. Pretty much everyone feels this way except a handful of efrogs that want outsized gains for themselves while simultaneously parading themselves around as the would be OG gods of altruism. Nothing would test those words more than for them to get nothing extra and LXP be the primary factor by far. I can already here the cries and floor dumping from here were that the case. I feel like they almost have to give them a little something extra though otherwise their “most vocal and supportive communities” would feel the same sting everyone else did, but on the other hand everyone else would probably finally come around to liking Linea again. I still feel like they should be counted as like a beta or alpha nft and that would be fair enough.
Anyway, yeah I doubt much changes. I was thinking to do one final write up though, which I might do today. Just a quick summary of sentiment and brass tacks.