The distribution of these tokens is designed to reward active participants in the Linea ecosystem. A proposal suggests a tiered system based on LXP points, with additional multipliers for factors such as token age, liquidity provision, and special NFTs held. This approach aims to ensure a fair and proportional distribution among eligible users.
5 Likes
I think you accidentally skipped this step, and this may impact the remaining points? If so, please correct it for us according to your approach.
1 Like
You just copied @LetmeCook’s work nothing new, at least give him credit.
There is no need to open new topic here.
2 Likes
Lol, the guy who lobbies for the interests of the sybils in the thread about hacking 38,000 AdsPower wallets is now teaching how to distribute an airdrop.
Are you seriously discussing this? lol
3 Likes
and also its a copied work
Great job on catching that! Now that the mistake is corrected, everything should be back on track. Let me know if you need any further adjustments!
Haha, that’s quite the irony! Sometimes the most unexpected sources share the weirdest advice. People definitely have interesting takes on things.
I understand your point, and I appreciate the feedback. I made some improvements, but I’ll make sure to credit @LetmeCook for the original work.
not work 
1 Like
I agree with a rank system regarding LXP, but it has too many ranks, especially if you study the data you will realize that people with 12,000 LXP are very few. The first rank cut-off should be 8,000LXP. There are 1,327 people who have more than 8,000LXP, a prudent number for the first cut-off and so on.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the rank system for LXP! I understand your concern about the number of ranks and the distribution of users across different LXP thresholds. Your suggestion to set the first rank cut-off at 8,000 LXP is well-reasoned, especially since it aligns with the data showing that 1,327 people have achieved this milestone. This number seems like a balanced and meaningful threshold for distinguishing the top performers.
To build on your idea, we could consider a tiered ranking system that reflects the natural distribution of LXP. For example:
- 8,000 LXP and above: This could be the first rank, recognizing the top 1,327 users as an elite group.
- 5,000–7,999 LXP: A mid-tier rank for highly active and dedicated users.
- 2,000–4,999 LXP: A rank for engaged users who are making consistent progress.
- Below 2,000 LXP: A rank for newer or less active users, encouraging them to climb the ranks.
This approach would simplify the system while still providing meaningful milestones for users to strive toward. It also ensures that the ranks are achievable yet challenging, which can motivate users to stay engaged.
Would you like me to help refine this further or analyze the data in more detail to suggest additional cut-offs? Let me know!
3 Likes
Yes looks good to me also
It doesn’t make any sense these rankings, have completely different levels of difficulty from 2000 to reach 5000 lxp and 5000lxp to reach 8000 lxp. This is completely nonsense.
people with >7000lxp are only 0.4%.even if they get double allocation it doesn’t even have any impact on other tiers,(I am not suggesting to get double allocation it is just an example.)
Tiers should be every 1k lxp
with additional criteria as multipliers to be applied.
1 Like
Great! I’m glad the proposed solution aligns with your expectations. Implementing tiers every 1k LXP with additional multipliers for specific activities ensures a fairer and more balanced system. This approach not only makes progression more achievable for a broader range of participants but also rewards meaningful contributions and engagement.
If you need further refinements or assistance in implementing this structure, feel free to ask! This should create a more inclusive and motivating environment for all users involved in the airdrop.
1 Like
the most important action is removing wallets with less than 2000 lxp. They dont have enough contribution to project
2 Likes
So if a person who made 1.2k txn, daily activity for 8months, 22eth total onchain volume, 80+ dapps, but <2k LXP is not enough contribution? Linea is not made for LXP only.
1 Like
That would be a wallet deployed on Linea just weeks after the Dencun update, So these metrics could have been easily replicated with a script under low fees.
This is exactly why we have an XP program and POH, To measure users contributions to the network covering a vast area; It may not be perfect, But every user had a chance to participate. And imo, This was a much better choice than some of the other networks that used criteria only known to team and the insiders. (For instance holding some random meme on a completely different chain)
For those who don’t want to take part in quests, There was The Surge.
2 Likes
@Thisu I will advise you stop wasting your time replying to this guy because there is no amount of explanation what will make him understand, I think he’s just an attention seeker, you can see a lot of sparm messages, even with his annoying attitude, all answers were given to him but because he has little lxp/l he want to create a model that favour his simulated arbitrum model, as far as I’m concerned, his opinion is invalid and will soon (if not already) be obsolete just like the others.
Repeatedly spamming the same question will not make him relevant.
3 Likes
This person passed POH and owns eFrog and Foxy, creates NFTs and all with a positive chain value. And you are still more real than this person, got it!
1 Like
In my eyes, you have described yourself perfectly!
1 Like