Dear Team,
Please refrain from implementing tier-based categorization for Linea’s LXP points. Many community members were unable to complete tasks due to Hunter attacks during the Park campaign and the numerous bugs on the L3 platform, despite being early participants. They actively participated in previous campaigns where network transaction costs were high, which highlights the unfairness of introducing tier-based categorization. Many of them lost substantial LXP points during the Park campaign despite the fact that its extremely low transaction costs.
I kindly request that you either consider the total LXP points per wallet without tiering or create a different point system for campaigns conducted before L3. Additionally, provide specific recognition for early users who supported the testnet phase.
Although a significant number of hunters with multiple accounts have been identified and removed, many still remain. These individuals not only exploited other airdrops but also abused Linea’s L3 campaigns with minimal effort and cost. Participating in earlier campaigns was not worth their time and expense due to the higher costs and effort required.
Moreover, some of them bought fake exchange accounts and completed POH (Proof of Humanity) without genuine engagement. It would be fair to allocate separate points for users who participated in the campaigns prior to the Park campaign, and especially during the testnet phase, because testnet phase since it was far more challenging than other Linea campaigns due to the bugs encountered.
Recognizing early supporters who have been with the network from the start is crucial. There should also be a clear distinction between these genuine contributors and those who merely purchased and farmed testnet NFTs.
Thank you for considering these suggestions to ensure fairness and acknowledge the contributions of early and genuine participants.
One more point:
Sybil farmers are filling out the appeal forms in this way and are also advising others to write the same or similar reasons. For example:
Someone who only has transactions on the Linea network writes:
“I’m new to the crypto world, and I started my activity, although limited, on Linea because I had heard about its importance.”
Or, if they have limited on-chain activity, they explain:
“Due to work commitments, I don’t have much time for activity, but I’m not a Sybil, and I didn’t want to miss the opportunity to participate in the network.”
It’s possible that some people who have been labeled as Sybil are not farmers, and their reasons are exactly the same as those provided by Sybil farmers, which might lead to their rights being ignored.
One way to distinguish these real users from Sybil hunters is to analyze the activity of those who started participating from the Park campaign and completed POH using fake exchange accounts. This is because hunters who created multiple wallets usually followed this pattern of activity.
Best regards.