we love linea
Friend, do you know if this is updated after the removal of Sybils? And if itâs not updated, do you know the current number of wallets in each LXP tier?
I think a lot of things will change with nansen sybil filter, layerzero list, AdsPower hack (some were also compromised without funds). I think the team will finish the remaining work
Nice write up
Thank you.
[quote=âKanenz, post:1, topic:9007â]
UPDATE on Sybil list
Now that The team has successfully eliminated most of the Sybil accounts (it is worth noting that Sybil canât be eliminated 100% but we must implement a system where they earn less). With the allowance of up to 20 wallets, the implementation of a tiered system now appears to be essential. Congratulations to the team and Nansen on this achievement.
Thanks to @0xebeggar, I requested the data from @ACHINTAMAJI9 on X
This is why I have consistently emphasized that **90% of wallets below 1,500 LXP are likely SybilsIt is evident that the majority of large-scale farmers, managing 20+ accounts, tend to fall within this range,**while the small farmers with 5+ accounts seat within 2k to 2k, the number of accounts reduced significantly as we move up the tiers highlighting the necessity of setting a minimum LXP threshold.
By comparing the provided tables, it becomes clear that the lowest tier has the highest concentration of Sybil accounts, with the percentage decreasing significantly as we move up the tiers. This pattern strongly supports the argument that the team must avoid the mistake of implementing a linear distribution model.
The data reinforces the importance of adopting a structured and tiered approach structure that minimizes rewards for such accounts(if <1500 lxp is to be considered) . This way, legitimate users are not adversely impacted, while Sybil accounts receive reduced incentives to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation.
> KNOWN ISSUES
LXP OVERAGE
I think the reason is this just like what @MountainXX said

I think a lot of things will change with nansen sybil filter, layerzero list, AdsPower hack (some were also compromised without funds). I think the team will finish the remaining work
With this data it is easy to tweak it since everything is clearly explained also
adjustment can also be made to any TIER OR MULTIPLIER
Thanks for the clarification.
With those factored in, there will be a better allocation for the community.
Youâve done an enormous amount of work for the community, and so far, your distribution model resonates with me the most. Thank you for your work, my friend
Indeed good proposal.
Comparing to all others, including popular @LeChiffre 's one, itâs far ahead of them. The most fair design

Comparing to all others, including popular @LeChiffre 's one, itâs far ahead of them. The most fair design
Lechiffre His design is not very good.
There are lots of extra bonuses in the design to keep the sybils happy.
Yeah, just mentioned it for reference as the most popular one
He has presented his model perfectly and answered all the questions logically. If this model is accepted, I ask the Linea team to add his wallet to the first tier.
He truly deserves it
Thatâs not entirely true â my questions regarding this model seem to be ignored for some reason. Iâd like to see more detailed levels for 9k+. Letâs not forget that the max level is 12,660, and it doesnât seem fair to lump it all into the general 8k+ range and just linearly increase the rewards.
Letâs show some respect to those at the higher levels, as there are only about 500 of them.
I would be great to see 9k+ tiers added to the table.

Thatâs not entirely true â my questions regarding this model seem to be ignored for some reason. Iâd like to see more detailed levels for 9k+. Letâs not forget that the max level is 12,660, and it doesnât seem fair to lump it all into the general 8k+ range and just linearly increase the rewards.
Letâs show some respect to those at the higher levels, as there are only about 500 of them.
I would be great to see 9k+ tiers added to the table.
I think you should take your time to read the proposal first and understand it before complaining, the reasons were explained and for your information they only share the same pool they donât get the same reward, once you enter the pool the reward becomes linear
You should take another look at my post, and maybe my other questions in this thread as well.
Just to clarify, I literally mentioned the linear distribution in the 8k+ pool in my message and said I didnât think it was very fair.
Boy, you couldnât even read my nickname correctly and ended up pasting a screenshot of someone else.
You need to relax.

Letâs not forget that the max level is 12,660, and it doesnât seem fair to lump it all into the general 8k+ range and just linearly increase the rewards.
Letâs show some respect to those at the higher levels, as there are only about 500 of them.
I would be great to see 9k+ tiers added to the table.
I think your problem is greediness this is the only model that gives a fair allocation to those people but you are not satisfy you want more
The reason i think it stop at 8k is because of the number of wallets also the rewards is caped but does not punish people with 9,10,11 and 12

you couldnât even read my nickname correctly and ended up pasting a screenshot of someone else.
sorry for that BOY but that doesnât still change the points. This question has been asked and answered several times, there is a link at the lot of the post, there are a lots of discussion there as well.
The problem is not reading properly
Dude, be respectful. Thereâs nothing wrong with what the guy said, and technically heâs right.
Anything over 8k could be a separate tier.How do you feel if someone ignores the difference between 8k and 5k lxp?