So a user who made 20 accounts and farmed the easiest badge gets the same tokens as a user who got all 29 badges? this is just wrong.
I donât think you are good at calculations, All you have to do is study the distribution model, how many people have the one badge.
And if they had done it linearly it will be the worst airdrop.
Study the model and donât argue at a superficial level
But for your information the model here is even better
Now apply what you said to people with 4 badges in 20 wallets, also ask yourself how many people fall in to that category? Do the same and scale to the highest tier
A sybil can make hundreds of accounts that can farm the easiest badge that would result in imense profit if that model is followed.
From your ss 1 badge = 51 tokens/account.
20 accounts with 1 badge = 20x51 = 1020 tokens
So again, 1 user who got all 29 badges gets the same amount of tokens as someone who farmed with 20 wallets the easiest badge.
My point is that this model favours sybils, industrial farmers,there should have been a minimum quantity of badges for receiving the tokens.
Anyway that model is a bit unusual beacuse there is a high amount of users in medium-to high tiers which we can see that is diffrent from linea.
Yes I agree with you, that is why I said the model here is even better reason
- Linea already carried out sybil analysis by nansen
- There is a suggestion for minimum or smaller rewards for the lowest tire since the effort is minimal
Although I think they allowed that because only 30k falls in that range but if you look at people with 2,3,and 4 one can also argue its not a bad idea
In summary you agree the model is good if they had conducted sybil analysis and set a minimum requirement
Is this official?
The minimum badge threshold will destroy the sybils.and will reward real users at all levels well.
Looks like using two wallets with 1 badge is better than earning 10 badges in single wallet. Same rewards with 0.2x effort Lol
we love linea
Friend, do you know if this is updated after the removal of Sybils? And if itâs not updated, do you know the current number of wallets in each LXP tier?
I think a lot of things will change with nansen sybil filter, layerzero list, AdsPower hack (some were also compromised without funds). I think the team will finish the remaining work
Nice write up
Thank you.
[quote=âKanenz, post:1, topic:9007â]
UPDATE on Sybil list
Now that The team has successfully eliminated most of the Sybil accounts (it is worth noting that Sybil canât be eliminated 100% but we must implement a system where they earn less). With the allowance of up to 20 wallets, the implementation of a tiered system now appears to be essential. Congratulations to the team and Nansen on this achievement.
Thanks to @0xebeggar, I requested the data from @ACHINTAMAJI9 on X
This is why I have consistently emphasized that **90% of wallets below 1,500 LXP are likely SybilsIt is evident that the majority of large-scale farmers, managing 20+ accounts, tend to fall within this range,**while the small farmers with 5+ accounts seat within 2k to 2k, the number of accounts reduced significantly as we move up the tiers highlighting the necessity of setting a minimum LXP threshold.
By comparing the provided tables, it becomes clear that the lowest tier has the highest concentration of Sybil accounts, with the percentage decreasing significantly as we move up the tiers. This pattern strongly supports the argument that the team must avoid the mistake of implementing a linear distribution model.
The data reinforces the importance of adopting a structured and tiered approach structure that minimizes rewards for such accounts(if <1500 lxp is to be considered) . This way, legitimate users are not adversely impacted, while Sybil accounts receive reduced incentives to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation.
> KNOWN ISSUES
LXP OVERAGE
I think the reason is this just like what @MountainXX said

I think a lot of things will change with nansen sybil filter, layerzero list, AdsPower hack (some were also compromised without funds). I think the team will finish the remaining work
With this data it is easy to tweak it since everything is clearly explained also
adjustment can also be made to any TIER OR MULTIPLIER
Thanks for the clarification.
With those factored in, there will be a better allocation for the community.
Youâve done an enormous amount of work for the community, and so far, your distribution model resonates with me the most. Thank you for your work, my friend
Indeed good proposal.
Comparing to all others, including popular @LeChiffre 's one, itâs far ahead of them. The most fair design

Comparing to all others, including popular @LeChiffre 's one, itâs far ahead of them. The most fair design
Lechiffre His design is not very good.
There are lots of extra bonuses in the design to keep the sybils happy.