well I disagree with you i don’t even have up to 6k and I have been here since private testnet, beta NFT , i remember @aeridyne also mention this to cap the tire at 5k. Reason is because if you do everything from the beginning of the private testnet, linea entertainment festival, linea park, culture szn you will end up with 5k plus to 7k depending on the NFT you hold.
Anything above 7k is mass NFT buyers which I am not against you can check all my comments.
but the problem with you guys is greediness, adding extra tiers will not increase your rewards, because the rewards are calculated base on proportion.
So again technically he is not right and the example you give is invalid
1 Like
I don’t think you’re greedy, but you can be selfish.
everything i said is fact, you can read that again
Yes this is true
1 Like
Why not add additional tiers with this kind of distribution? It would require an additional 11,000,000 tokens, which would hardly affect the other participants since it would only reduce their rewards by 1%. Due to the small number of participants in the higher tiers, you could set almost any rewards. I believe for the highest tier, 150,000 tokens would be appropriate. Your model, which offers linear distribution in the 8k+ pool, gives the participant in 1st place 50% more than a participant with 8k LXP, even though the difference in effort is huge. The first one in a million—don’t they deserve it?
Only someone who is jealous could be against it, because it would reduce their reward by just 1% (for example, instead of 5,000 tokens, they would get 4,950)
I did all the calculations in the table in just a few minutes. Feel free to correct me if there’s a mistake somewhere, but I believe the general idea is clear.
@Kanenz I wonder what your thoughts are on this?
Frankly, it does not seem fair to include the lowest levels in the table and limit the highest levels to 8k.
@Kanenz I wonder what your thoughts are on this?
The reward system includes a cap to ensure balanced distribution, but it does not penalize higher LXP holders. Instead, it provides linear rewards, ensuring that those with more LXP still receive proportionate benefits while maintaining fairness across all tiers.
I think there’s something strange here.
It doesn’t seem to make sense to allocate 50 million tokens under 1k lxp and ignore the highest tier.
The lower echelons spent no money or effort, but the upper echelon spent thousands of dollars.
I wonder what exactly is stopping it at 8k lxp
The question is how many wallets are receiving 5%? 250k
How many wallets are receiving 4% in the highest tier? 1327
Did you do the calculations?
And what did you mean by ignore the highest tire?
I personally don’t even have 8,000 LXP, yet I’ve been here since before the chain was even called Linea, actively participating in 99% of all campaigns. The reality is that without NFTs, it’s nearly impossible to accumulate more than 5,000 to 6,000 LXP except for a few winners of the Linea Entertainment Festival and champions.
That said, the model still fairly rewards those individuals for the risks they took. Every token distribution requires a cap to prevent excessive rewards, ensuring fairness and sustainability. A great example of this approach is the Arbitrum airdrop.
1 Like
Ignoring the high tiers is when you suddenly start distributing tokens linearly from the 8k LXP tier onward.
Can you specifically point out the downsides of my table?The rewards for the other participants will only be reduced by 1%, so the balance will be preserved, but you’ll reward the top performers appropriately.
I have already answered your questions above
Alright, what was said above doesn’t seem like a thoughtful response.
Honestly, after you mentioned your personal LXP level, a lot of things became clearer.
I’m sure the team will be more objective in this matter.
I’m just being transparent with you because some people even accuse me of over rewarding those with 8k plus because they believe I fall into that tire. I’m not obligated to tell you this but everything is for the sake of transparency and fairness and moreover this is just a proposal, if you read carefully
1 Like
How else do you want me to explain this to you?
1 Like
Why do we need a cap of about 50,000 tokens?
What’s wrong with my cap? What exactly prevents us from increasing it? I don’t understand who’s going to get hurt by this?
@Kanenz I think he want you to give him 166k token then he will be happy with you
there are many proposals in the forum, this is the only one that reward them fairly but they are greedy, they always want more.
This part is just about linear distribution and fairness. Why suddenly linear distribution, and how does it violate fairness in my example?
Your answer literally says nothing. That’s why I wanted to get some specific feedback.
It seems you are so greedy and selfish and advocating only for yourself. We want fair distribution, better leave the decision to Linea team.
3 Likes