WOW ! nice model token distribution , A lot of work
1 Like
Your model is good, but it is clearly underdeveloped when it comes to the highest tiers. Essentially, your model has placed the 12k tier into one combined 8k+ tier, even though the difference between 8k and 12k is enormous. I canât even imagine what it takes to reach such a levelâsimply purchasing an NFT is clearly not enough.
As it stands, the 8k, 9k, 10k, 11k, and 12k tiers will receive a linear distribution relative to each other. Why did you stop at tier 8k?
Iâm curious to hear your thoughts on this.
2 Likes
I am aware of this issue, but it seems to me that it doesnât apply to everyone above the 8k tier.
1 Like
totally agree, we dont set threshold for sybil any more, we set threshold to remove the people who dont have good contribution to this project. And 2000 lxp is very reasonable by joining 1 big campaign and some small event. Itâs easy and if you still can not do that, you shouldnât eligible for reward
5 Likes
I agree with you, this is still the best design so far, the team should fine tune it and make adjustments especially 4k and 5k should be increased while 8k, other tiers that needs improvement should be improved should be reduced this will create a better balance @dfox @nakedwinnie @Chinzilla @bigironchris
I hope to hear feedback on this topic.
THESE ARE THE REASONS WHY IT IS THE BEST PROPOSAL
- It answers all the questions
- It covers gas fee for early participants
- It uses tire for grading base on difficulty and wallet distribution
- It apply linear distribution within tires for precision
- It compensate people that heavily invested in nfts which was not linearly scaled
- It distribute the token to different tires base on% and number of wallets
- It separate lxp from lxpl
- It advise allocation for other communities but advice it should be separated from lxp to avoid conflict
- It set a minimum cap with booster for active participants to qualify and a cap at 8k which needs to be reduced
- It is detailed and transparent
All we need is refinement but overall the model is very very good.
Thank you @Kanenz for all the work you put in you deserve to be rewarded for the beautiful work.
4 Likes
Just think about it: increasing the distribution at the 4k and 5k tiers, where 250,000,000 tokens are allocated, by decreasing the 8k tier, which only has 40,000,000 tokens, is not an easy task.
To increase the allocation at the 4k and 5k tiers by at least 10% (which is not very significant for the user), you would need to reduce the allocation at the 8k tier by 60%, which would result in a reduction of rewards by more than half.
1 Like
reducing the amount of rewards at the upper levels does not increase the amount of rewards at the lower levels as much as you think, because there is not much reward to be given to them(8k+) (as much as you think)
3 Likes
Please stop arguing, because you are only protecting your own interests. Let the dev team consider and decide for themselves
3 Likes
good points to note
1 Like
If the team thinks of a reward mechanism based on this title, most people will be satisfied (real people) @dfox
2 Likes
So a user who made 20 accounts and farmed the easiest badge gets the same tokens as a user who got all 29 badges? this is just wrong.
I donât think you are good at calculations, All you have to do is study the distribution model, how many people have the one badge.
And if they had done it linearly it will be the worst airdrop.
Study the model and donât argue at a superficial level
But for your information the model here is even better
1 Like
Now apply what you said to people with 4 badges in 20 wallets, also ask yourself how many people fall in to that category? Do the same and scale to the highest tier
A sybil can make hundreds of accounts that can farm the easiest badge that would result in imense profit if that model is followed.
From your ss 1 badge = 51 tokens/account.
20 accounts with 1 badge = 20x51 = 1020 tokens
So again, 1 user who got all 29 badges gets the same amount of tokens as someone who farmed with 20 wallets the easiest badge.
My point is that this model favours sybils, industrial farmers,there should have been a minimum quantity of badges for receiving the tokens.
Anyway that model is a bit unusual beacuse there is a high amount of users in medium-to high tiers which we can see that is diffrent from linea.
2 Likes
Yes I agree with you, that is why I said the model here is even better reason
- Linea already carried out sybil analysis by nansen
- There is a suggestion for minimum or smaller rewards for the lowest tire since the effort is minimal
Although I think they allowed that because only 30k falls in that range but if you look at people with 2,3,and 4 one can also argue its not a bad idea
In summary you agree the model is good if they had conducted sybil analysis and set a minimum requirement
2 Likes
Is this official?
The minimum badge threshold will destroy the sybils.and will reward real users at all levels well.
Looks like using two wallets with 1 badge is better than earning 10 badges in single wallet. Same rewards with 0.2x effort Lol
2 Likes