You didn’t understand what I was saying. The point is that no matter how harmful for some participants this decision was, it would be better for the team not to deviate from the plan. Twitching, the desire to please someone contrary to your initial plans is a sign of weakness and insecurity in your actions. In this pursuit with the desire to please everyone, you can come to a result when absolutely everyone will be dissatisfied. I was there on the day of the announcement of the LXP distribution for NFT and I can assure you that about 99% of the community was satisfied with this decision, thinking it was
So yeah, we can call a minority those who are unsatisfied. In their view, it was unfair, although 99% think otherwise. So what are we going to say now, that 1% are geniuses and 99% are madmen? No, we won’t, because all market participants have different views of fairness, which may not coincide. The decision to invest and get extra income lay on your shoulders, I will repeat once again. Blaming someone for the fact that you overinvested is, in my opinion, the wrong strategy. Each profit is accompanied by risks that are often difficult to predict. That’s why you get huge extra income in crypto, because the risks here are colossal compared to traditional finance
What kind of concepts of morality you want from me if this distribution is 100% subjective thing. All moralities and norms were created by society, if you didn’t now. If those norms accepted by 99% of Linea community don’t agree with yours, it doesn’t mean that someone is abnormal, it means that you have different ideas about the norms, where the majority thinks differently than you.
Excuse me, you’re saying “it’s a sign of humility and strength. The strongest people accept their mistakes, correct them, and adapt quickly.”, but what kind of humility can we expect if it’s basically 1% of community being unsatisfied ? It’s excatly what you’re defending saying
Linea said there were really some problems with fairness, but overall they prevented whales to accumulate high steaks of LXP on accounts, which is quite healthy to my mind. At the end of the day, what’s the difference if for example max allo goes to those who hold >8k LXP. Even if those NFTs gave you like 100k LXP it wouldn’t change anything, just a matter of numbers. Or you want speculate and earn 100x times more buying NFTs than those who spent days and nights grinding onchain, creating a gigantic inequality gap ? And after this you tell me about norms and morality?
I’m an old participant of the market as well, and from my experience I learnt that blaming someone else except yourself and your risk management is always a sign of immature. Blaming someone else for your personal decision and chase for greed and profits is not a healthy thing. The team apologized for those 1% of unsatisfied, about not having met their expectations. But I gues when it comes to saving 99% you won’t change the pland and structure of distribution.
Greed is not appropriate here. Those who bought different tiers were better awarded purely by chance. It doesn’t gurantee it will work well for them the next time in different projects. Just pure random. We can speculate that a person who owns one tier is likely want to collect NFTs of different tiers in order to collect and not repeat themselves, but honestly, this is already esotericism, for which I do not have the strength and time. What happened, is what happened, I am very sorry for your situation. But changing your shoes on the go and making adjustments regarding already solved problems with TGE in a couple of months is not a very rational idea.
