You know, when you guys ask questions like this, it just once again confirms your absolute distance from the Linea ecosystem. You are completely out of the loop.
Don’t disgrace yourself
10 Likes
I think it’s time for people like you to think about your own value, and not about underestimating and evaluating someone else’s
1 Like
they have nothing to say about it
Not sure if you mean Linea team @cacato but these are community based convos that the team does check out. My bad if you meant something else.
I like the idea, but this shoud be more detailled o wallet ranked 1-8k
Sorry, English is not my native language and I often speak ambiguously. In this case I meant the sybils. I love and respect the Linea team 
3 Likes
who? they listen. I hope 
The answer to your question is right above you 
agreed, there shouldn’t be an allocation for nft projects. They’ll benefit from the liquidity boost in the ecosystem post TGE anyways.
1 Like
here is my answer:
The issue with paperlesshash is that he’s against any kind of community within Linea.
For him, the communities that formed and are having fun on the Linea network should be excluded from everything. Yet, these are communities that were born on Linea and live exclusively on Linea.
However, I can’t find a single post from the author on the various forums about the zkSync airdrop, or LayerZero distributing rewards to holders of Pudgy Penguins, or the dozens of collections on Berachain like HoneyComb that are set to grant tokens, Bad Kids giving airdrops across the entire Cosmos ecosystem, Azuki, Doodles… do I need to go on?
There’s no insider trading in the NFT collection ecosystem on Linea: everything was launched in a fair manner. But you need to be involved on the community to be aware 
Not helping or rewarding communities, especially those that were created and live exclusively within the ecosystem, shows a profound lack of understanding of how to build and sustain an ecosystem.
Sadly, your opinion is far removed from the growth realities of an ecosystem, not to mention it’s selfish as hell: “Give me all the tokens, I did the LXP tasks, I deserve them.”
My little hypothesis: I bet you only made transactions during the LXP campaigns and were inactive every other day of the year. (sic)
- you completely lack common sense: try to see it from the perspective of the project’s founding team to understand just how backwards your message is.
The founding team’s first job is to build a community and growth within their ecosystem.
So yes, they will reward those who participated in the LXP and LXP-L campaigns, but I think they’ll also reward those who contribute year-round to the blossoming of communities that have sprung up from Linea.
2 Likes
Your article is very good. I think it would be good to open it as a new topic on its own. You can give people a good perspective on the community. thanks mate.
here is my reply
It’s amusing to see you so passionate about defending speculative communities, but let’s be clear: rewarding real contributors should be the priority, not those looking to profit off the hype. Other ecosystems may reward NFTs, but Linea should be focused on rewarding tangible efforts that contribute to growth, not short-term speculation.
Your constant reference to other projects is quite telling, but it only diverts attention from the real issue how do we build something sustainable? Your perspective on Linea’s future seems a bit off-track if you think speculative assets should be prioritized over real contributions. 
And regarding your assumptions about me, it looks like you’re more interested in sidestepping the issue than addressing it head-on. If you truly believe speculative assets should take precedence over actual contributions, that’s a concerning outlook for Linea’s growth.
We were thinking you were addressing Linea’s token distribution, but from your comment, it looks like you forgot to include “distribution for yourself” in front of those big multipliers.
Okay real contributor, it’s time to show yourself. Could you please share with us your contribution? Not only your fakes and fantasies.
7 Likes
It’s absolutely clear that this paperlesshash hasn’t attended a single AMA with Linea, hasn’t read their Twitter, hasn’t been to conferences, and hasn’t listened to their presentations. He’s living in his own fabricated illusion and trying to tell people who’s valuable and who’s not - and doing it in an aggressive manner. Chill out, dude, you’re ruining the vibe.
2 Likes
Where does he even find the time? He’s clearly busy following the manual: “Make 50 accounts for $5 each and get life-changing results.”
4 Likes
haha nice, where is that manual. I want to study it :)))
If I were someone who didn’t collect lxp this would sound like a great idea. I would say ‘‘ha ha ha look at the idiots they collected lxp for months and got a bag of shit in return.’’
1 Like
Your issue seems to be that you prefer anything you don’t own to have no multiplier, and ideally, the upper limit of LXP score tiers should just happen to match your score.
When you said that Efrogs is speculation rather than an investment, I realized you might not be active in the community or are solely focused on completing tasks. If Efrogs were merely an NFT without any derivatives or planned projects, I could accept your claim that it’s speculative. But it’s clear that Efrogs is more than just an NFT.
It not only helps promote new projects on Linea but also organizes events and offers rewards. Furthermore, it has since released $CROAK and Froglets. Efrogs has achieved so much, yet it’s unfortunate that you’re unwilling to understand or acknowledge it.
Similarly, projects like Foxy or others can also be included in the discussion, and I think that’s perfectly reasonable.
5 Likes
great attempt at manipulation, but if you read carefully, you would see that BONUS is an addition to certain criteria
1 Like