Initial Wallet Filtering for Loyalty

Token Design
1

I reviewed several posts and comments, and here’s what I’ve gathered:

  1. Multi-account users are concerned about the average token value being held for a certain period as a filter.
  2. I believe the initial filtering criterion should focus on the average asset value over a specified timeframe. This approach can help filter out:
  • Potential Sybil farms
  • Multi-account users
  • Low-loyalty users

A suitable starting point for the first filter could be setting the threshold at an average wallet balance of less than $30 over the past year. The wallet balance should include both token holdings and liquidity provided.

A $30 threshold is relatively small, and I’m confident that loyal Linea users would maintain token holdings exceeding this value for an extended period. On the other hand, multi-account users or Sybil farms most likely deposit only the minimum amount of ETH required to cover fees for point collection. By analyzing the average token value, we can effectively identify these uncommitted or multi-wallet farming activities.

After filtering wallets based on the average balance, additional criteria, such as LXP threshold, extra POH, can be applied to ensure a fair distribution.

I clearly see that some people are worried about this criteria and I am certain that those are low-loyalty users or multi-wallet farmers.

2 Likes
2

I personally propose at least average 50 or 100 dollars to detect only loyal users.

If users are not classified into this criteria, most likely multi-wallet farmers or low loyalty users who don’t deserve reward.

3 Likes
3

As long as it’s a liquidity+hold value, I’m fine with it because I admit I’ve put almost everything into supply and no longer have much liquid ETH directly in my wallet.

4

So, accroding to you, having like 6k LXP, EFrogs NFT which cost 2.5k$ rn, 1.5 years of constant transactions and interaction with chain, hundreds of dollars spent on fees is not a real and sufficient indicator of loyalty, but rather $30 on the balance in the L2 network, where after 4844 fees are around 0.05$ and doesn’t require you to hold huge sums of money just to pay fees :joy:
It’s funny to be honest.

The problem is not in balance, the real problem is those who came after eip upgrade, those who spent 5$ on Linea Park at the very last week. Exclude them by simply implementing threshold of 1.5k-2k LXP, add some multiplyers for those who came pre-Dencun and you’ll be totally fine. The balance criteria is ridiculous and at the same time large farms have learned from the bitter experience of Starknet and are unlikely to abandon the idea of ​​a residual balance. You are more likely to exclude real users who do not need to keep large amounts on their balance in a cheap L2 network

2 Likes