Implementing a Hybrid Token Distribution Model: Combining Tier-Based Allocation with Proportional Distribution Within Tiers and Gas Fee Adjustments

[Kycper]

Your proposal is very good; the only thing I would improve is to take into account the new LXP that will be distributed. As we know, the LXP taken from sybils will be redistributed among regular users, so we can estimate that each wallet will receive about 30% more LXP. Therefore, I would suggest increasing the tiers at which the drop becomes available to even 2,500–3,000 LXP. Additionally, I would raise the tiers, but this will only become clear after the team announces how much LXP was taken from users and how much we will receive. I believe they will announce this in about a week.

[Kanenz]

We don’t have data on that yet but the most important thing is the model itself, with lxps reallocated to real users other variables can be adjusted proportionally

[Kanenz]

@don

i think rewarding community (NFT’s + Memecoins) active users would be pretty Ideal.

@Kanenz

Additionally, I think it would be a good idea to allocate a small portion of tokens to certain communities that have actively contributed to the project’s growth. However, I strongly recommend that this allocation remains separate from LXP.

Your question is covered here.

[Seia]

There will be no distribution of further lxp.
Simply Linea tokens that were supposed to go to sybil will go to eligle users

[Mantisek]

Nice work, Linea team should look on this

[Kanenz]

Yes that’s correct since lxp is soul bound

[Destroycovid]

Best suggestion so far, I think the team should definitely consider it. Thanks Kanenz

[Kanenz]

You’re welcome

[Loza]

@dfox @Chinzilla
This is a topic that is currently on the twitter agenda.
I am sure that the team is examining this issue and they will take it into consideration.
People want to know that those who make the most effort will be rewarded well. We trust Linea!
What we want is that high labouring people with a single wallet are fairly rewarded.

[lineaboi]

I believe they are going to review it hopefully. Maga farmers will not be happy with this idea

[dadujex]

This is a well-structured, thoughtful, and balanced proposal. I agree with the tier-based approach, gas fee adjustments for early participants. It ensures fairness, rewards genuine contributors, and maintains transparency.

There could be also bonus for developers/ambassadors, just ensure they’re clearly defined.

[MountainXX]

@Kanenz

By comparing the provided tables, it becomes clear that the lowest tier has the highest concentration of Sybil accounts, with the percentage decreasing significantly as we move up the tiers. This pattern strongly supports the argument that the team must avoid the mistake of implementing a linear distribution model.

The data reinforces the importance of adopting a structured and tiered approach to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation.

I agree with you 100% token design is very very important and should not favours over single wallet users. I had to read again and I can tell that everything align perfectly. @dfox @nakedwinnie @Chinzilla @bigironchris

[lineaboi]

@Kanenz

Now that The team has successfully eliminated most of the Sybil accounts. With the allowance of up to 20 wallets, the implementation of a tiered system now appears to be essential. Congratulations to the team and Nansen on this achievement.

Thanks to @0xebeggar, I requested the data from @ACHINTAMAJI9 on X
This is why I have consistently emphasized that **90% of wallets below 1,500 LXP are likely SybilsIt is evident that the majority of large-scale farmers, managing 20+ accounts, tend to fall within this range,**while the small farmers with 5+ accounts seat within 2k to 2k, the number of accounts reduced significantly as we move up the tiers highlighting the necessity of setting a minimum LXP threshold.

By comparing the provided tables, it becomes clear that the lowest tier has the highest concentration of Sybil accounts, with the percentage decreasing significantly as we move up the tiers. This pattern strongly supports the argument that the team must avoid the mistake of implementing a linear distribution model.

The data reinforces the importance of adopting a structured and tiered approach to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation.

woo… I am speechless

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

There is only one fair metric: to evaluate contributions based on the actual amount of gas spent interacting with the network. LXP as a metric is completely unsuitable. Those with high LXP scores were simply farming LXP, which does not indicate that they are real users. Since the token launch is primarily about decentralization, it is necessary to distribute an equal number of tokens to all eligible network participants at the start. For those who deserve more than a certain amount of X tokens, a multi-year vesting period should be applied A good metric would be to revoke the entire remaining stack locked in multi-year vesting for anyone who sells their initial airdrop balance.

you are all over the place man, you can make your own proposal as you can see the title of the post, the team has been transparent from the beginning that contribution will be base on LXP and LXPL, why do you think that is going to change because you spam random transactions just after you missed the voyages?.. for your information this a deep analysis witch also covers gas fee for early participants and how the airdrop can be fair and healthy for the ecosystem

[Kanenz]

@weaksweak

There has never been any information about LXP or an airdrop for them—don’t delude yourself. However, LXP was promised, for example, for LINEA NFTs, which the team completely backtracked on. There’s no deep research here—just another person tailoring the criteria to their own wallets, trying to squeeze out a bigger allocation without even understanding the purpose of it.

This shows that you know nothing about linea and most likely new to the community but let me provide evidence for you for reference

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

There has never been any information about LXP or an airdrop for them—don’t delude yourself. However, LXP was promised, for example, for LINEA NFTs, which the team completely backtracked on. There’s no deep research here—just another person tailoring the criteria to their own wallets, trying to squeeze out a bigger allocation without even understanding the purpose of it.

you just make fool out of yourself

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

Show that you’re not dumb and provide proof of at least one article where the opposite is stated. You guys either haven’t bothered to research the project at all or are just plain stupid.

You are the most dumbest person here, you make a foolish claim and he just gave you a clear answer with an article released by linea itself and now you are crying…at least learn how to read

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

it’s not official and isn’t documented, mentioned in articles, or anything else.

Again this shows how dumb you are even after an official document you claim to stick to your ignorance

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

It’s simply a metric reflecting your contribution to the network’s development.

Again learn to read and think, you keep contradicting yourself

[lineaboi]

@weaksweak

It’s just an unofficial parameter, LXP, by which 95% of the airdrop will likely be conducted, but it’s purely formal—it’s not official and isn’t documented, mentioned in articles, or anything else

my advice to you is stop spaming unnessary transaction thinking you can game the system, you came late, you know nothing about the ecosystem contributed nothing and just fumbling around and looking for attention.