and that is how you think with your dumb head zero critical thinking…so someone can come today spam 1000 useless transactions since the snapshot has not been taking…your lack of reasoning is off the roof
2 Likes
what king of brain did you even have? have you even read what he proposed or you are not capable of assimilating the logic, if there is any proposal in this forum that is against farmers and the bunch of useless meme tokens you just mentioned, this is it. This your argument clearly shows that you don’t know what you are talking about.
1 Like
sybils like you have already done that, that is exactly how they think…looking for loopholes, what you can no longer get is LXP and LXPL
1 Like
The idea of gas fee and multiplier system makes sense. besides that it can also be to hold Linea ecosystem NFT… During the LineaPark Layer3 event, dozens of multi-accounts were created, and most of them easily reached 2,000 LXP with an average cost of just $30. As you know, we switched to the EIP contract at the very beginning of this event, and transaction fees dropped to almost free levels. Therefore, this data should be taken into consideration.
Collecting over +6k LXP really required effort.
1 Like
For farmers, it’s no problem to inflate gas fees, just as it’s not difficult to inflate the number of transactions, contracts, and volumes. These are outdated criteria that even the most stupid sybil understands.
4 Likes
Another twisted form of lobbying for their interests. Man, read up on what decentralization is and what’s needed for its successful implementation, then take a look at the number of wallets that match your hypothetical requirement.
and why are you spamming, you copied a post from another topic and pasted it here
2 Likes
everything is justified here base on data which i believe if you take your time to at least read the post all your answers are there
1 Like
You are absolutely correct, i observe there is a massive spamming by sybils in the forum today, they are trying their all means to divert the conversation. @dfox
1 Like
i dont agree with this cause i have only 5k LXP and im participate from the beggining even the gas fee super high. you cant say 6k LXP above only the participat from beggining when gas fee super high. why? cause there is linea voyage NFT which make me only tier 3 dont reach 6k LXP.
1 Like
Read carefully, 6k was only used as a demonstration in this case, gas fee will be applied to all participants before the upgrade.
2 Likes
It’s clearly stated here
2 Likes
@vikos46 hope I have answered your question
2 Likes
More explanation here
2 Likes
there is no need demonstration or example since every event data is saved by linea team before LXP dropped. if you say about high gas fee there are data for events which in high gas fee like intract event. Give 1,5x to peoples who received LXP for events when gas fee is high no need amount of LXP as parameter for this
1 Like
Did you understand this is a proposal?
You have to read and understand the design first
The first example was a demonstration, the table shared gives a more detailed explanation on the model.
Gas fee is a bonus for early participants not the main criteria.
1 Like
i know this is proposal but if there is an actual data so there is no need demonstration anymore bro. Your indicator is wrong to determine who is there when gas fee so high. you just need change the indicator to make your proposal is great
My indicator is correct, it’s you that’s having problem understanding it, it’s well detailed
1 Like
1+1 = 2
there is no need to say 1+1 example = 3 4 or 5
it will exactly 2
If LXP 1500 is the minimum eligibility for selecting farming bots, I think re-KYC with personal data sounds more logical. Not everything below 1500 is a bot
1 Like