"being LXP or LXP-L.
In the end, both of these points recognize involvement from two distinctly different user bases while providing greater transparency for each cohort.
This approach ensures a balanced alignment between LXP and LXP-L. "
you can check here:
linea.mirror.xyz/NzFOD8A8tvKIqqjpuJFxepkminihbCzu1n8q7FOoKfA
On top of that,
LXP-L is literally the only metric that can not be faked.
LXP-L Cannot be sybiled
LXP-L Had a Early contribution multiplier and a Referral system, promoting network effects.
This makes LXP-L the only and most absolute measurement of attribution to the chain. Even the documentation says greater transparency.
Imagine an official announcement saying a metric is the most transparent, and then allocating more to the obscure metric that its being run by sybils.
I think It would be unfair if suddenly the team changes the initial agreed upon rules and lowers the LXP-L allocation. Many LXP-L players focused on this because we thought it would be an equal field, not to mention the massive Smart Contract risk we took due to the lack of safer protocols like aave, curve.
We all know LXP is a headache to calculate because theres still probably hundreds of thousands of sybils, even after the first list, but theres no realistic way of cleaning them whitout cleaning legit users who make transactions between 5-7 friends.
i think at the very least, LXP-L and LXP should be equal. otherwise you would be over-alocating to wallets of who are in fact industrial sybil farms.
Another useless thread, only now the guy who bet on liquidity and ignored the LXP program. How annoying you are with your identical offers: “Give me more, and my neighbor less, otherwise I will cry”
The team said the LXP would be worth a lot more than the LXP-L.
LXP-L, by the way, is a win-win situation.
The main determinant here is the people who invest in linea ecosystem tokens and nft, not those who add dollar liquidity and earn interest.LOL
So they admit theres at least 900.000 sybils in a post, and then still give more than a clean transparent metric like LXP-L? Is it not weird they allocate so much to an obscure metric?
The team said the LXP would be worth a lot more than the LXP-L.
LXP-L, by the way, is a win-win situation.
The main determinant here is the people who invest in linea ecosystem tokens and nft, not those who add dollar liquidity and earn interest.LOL
The team has stated that Proof of Work > Proof of Liquidity multiple times during AMAs, even though the exact coefficient was never disclosed. All these manipulations with so-called “promises” look like pure childishness.
That’s exactly why Nansen did a great job (500k wallets), along with filtering out AdsPower wallets and reviewing L0 lists. I get your motivation, but people can just as easily start crying about how “the rich get richer” and “liquidity means nothing.” Balance is key, and the Linea team knows how to maintain it and what truly holds value from their perspective - without manipulations or twisting words.
Do you really think someone with 14 wallets passing the sybil filter is ok? Because they plainly admitting that below 15 was acceptable has a terrible optic
In general, it is obvious that you came to impose your point of view, so any dialogue is absolutely useless. The proposal is not new and has already been presented on this forum.
Oh no, that’s a twisted way to frame a suggestion. Things should be called by their proper names. There’s a huge gap between “I suggest” and “I demand.” Adults understand that no one owes anyone anything, and the very nature of airdrops is closer to a generous gesture than a paycheck.
lol, what else is left for the sybils that were destroyed by hackers? even if 30,000 of them come running - the answer will be - no. Your wallets are your concerns.
oh yeah that’s the one who isn’t willing or strong enough to put in the effort to collect lxp and instead tries to solve the problem by shitting on lxp
