Totally agree
3 Likes
Not half, but essentially all. eFrogs are holders of most projects because they are very involved in the ecosystem. But how would the sybils who dedicate their lives to monotonous, repetitive clicking of transactions know about this? I don’t blame them. I feel sorry for them.
8 Likes
I hope the things you have listed here will attract the attention of the team, because they reflect exactly the difference between real users and sybils.
You were right
I agreed with your last statement, if there’ll be any reward for Nft collections, it should be for all Nfts but in this scenario, there’ll be some specific Nfts to earn this reward.
The team knows everything, guys. Everybody gets what they deserve.
The number of people participating in the forum has increased considerably recently, and the insistence of newcomers on the elimination of sybils makes the situation quite serious.
Bro, I actually like your approach regarding the eFrogs NFT. I don’t own it, but I’ve already said in other discussions and I’ll say it again the number one NFT on Linea should be treated as such. And I’ll repeat this once more: the ideal system, which I and others have already mentioned, is to look at everything as a whole because Linea is a vast ecosystem. Focusing on a single factor is a mistake.
Instead of considering just one item, a point-based system should be implemented where, for every X points, a person moves up a tier. However, when it comes to NFTs, there should be a structured point distribution. For example:
Holders of the eFrogs NFT: 6 points
Holders of NFTs like Linpus Crew, Bunny Universe, and Frogletes: 3 points
Holders of other project NFTs: 1 point
In my opinion, NFTs worth $1 or $5, such as Linus Egg, should be valued at 1 point, which is sufficient. Of course, this tiered point system would not be limited to NFTs alone. However, since eFrogs is the top NFT, it should be treated accordingly.
Whenever I read a topic, I look at all the responses in general or at least the majority. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to please 100% of people. I tried to express my thoughts in the message above.
I’ve seen in other topics discussions saying things like “You should look at LXP-L the same way as LXP” or “You shouldn’t focus on the eFrogs NFT, only on LXP,” among many other opinions. However, the best approaches I’ve seen come from those who understand that the ideal solution is to consider everything as a whole rather than focusing on a single item.
A point-based system is the best approach, and as I mentioned earlier, I’m not an eFrogs NFT holder, but in my view, the number one NFT should be treated as such in a point system.
I totally agree, mate. We’re not supposed to keep a single sybil cluster happy.
1 Like
Buying a $2000 jpeg and typing hi fam on discord doesn’t make you an og. If you want to look for ogs, look for those who have contributed to the development of the network. There are few things as stupid as any stupid nft equaling 6k lxp.
how afraid he is that someone will be rewarded more than him, and he himself never tried… 
If I had bought NFT for 2000 dollars in the hope of getting an airdrop, I think I would be afraid.
That’s what you think. Let’s see what the team thinks.
Just as LXP and LXP-L are not the same thing.
LXP and different reward mechanisms are not the same thing.
I think there will be separate reward pools for those.
I suggest you calm down.
Apples and oranges are two different things.
ideas are bulletproof
Dude you are just a lobbyist. Makes no sense to randomly reward a random NFT project but having ran 2 year long XP campaigns. Make it make sense!!! Also dropping tokens to NFT projects gives me childish garage project vibes. Linea has to be best practice thought leadership showing how its done kind of vibes.
LOL @user1616
This whole cluster is anti og nft. So you’re probably the same person.
It’s high time you realized that this forum is teeming with sybils and obviously no one will perceive their opinion as “the opinion of the community”. This is a bunch of idiots who think they are smarter than everyone else and try to achieve their goals through fraud, threats and manipulation. You shouldn’t negotiate with terrorists.
1 Like