No one ever said that activity post March 28th will be considered as Sybil. Please do not spread false information.
Our goal is to prevent large centralized industrial farming operations from receiving an outsized portion of the LINEA airdrop as it is antithetical to our goals of decentralizatiin and takes away value from other indviduals. Generally speaking, if you think you’re a sybil, you’re a sybil. Someone using a few wallets shows up very different to automated bots with 1,000’s of wallets.
yeah bro, as Declan said, sybil is the large centralized industrial farming operations. Someone using a few wallets shows up very different to automated bots with 1,000’s of wallets. Me too, I do manually and spend more money and time to complete task for 3-4 wallets. As I remember, I stay up until 2 a.m. every day to do task. It’s different from automated bots bro. Many user still can do manually with 30-40 wallets bro, they spent 30-40x money and sit all day at their desk to contribute this project without any rest for many months. It’s different from who use bot and let them do automatically without any hardship and effort. And when they can do that, 200-500-1000 wallets is very easy and they will definitely do it instead of just making a few dozen wallets.
Dude, even your nickname is typical for a discord farm, what are you writing about, it’s funny
Every day more and more lobbyists from the Sibyl Army come to the forum. @dfox please don’t confuse their opinion with the community’s opinion, they have too much time and resources to engage in such substitution
I hope that under this guise and the joyful cheering of sybils, you guys don’t end up cutting off your real, loyal community. Because as we can see, this army is attacking it right now, and it’s getting stronger by the day. If you conduct research, you’ll find even public channels openly calling for these attacks. How can the community protect itself?
why you say that. Do you know, my name is Long, and my day of birth is 8-Sep. that’s why my nick name is that. All my twitter and discord and email is the same. Your way of talking really offends me, very disrespectful, I have used this name for over 15 years. and this is the first time I see the comment like yours. You are very ungrateful and impolite
You are all free to share your thoughts and opinions but please remain respectful towards other community members and keep discussions here related to the topic.
You don’t need to look for Sybils among users, including those who joined after the fee reductions (which are hundreds of thousands). You don’t need to consider LXP for the airdrop at all! Yes, it was an interesting metric, but LXP does not necessarily need to correlate with the airdrop. The fairest way to distribute tokens would be to allocate them proportionally to gas expenditures within the Linea network.
This simple action resolves absolutely all issues: those who joined earlier and made more expensive transactions will receive more, while those who joined later during cheaper transaction periods will receive less. However, everyone will be on equal terms, and each person will receive exactly what they deserve, regardless of any other criteria. This is the ideal approach that would not face any criticism from the community.
Additionally, introduce vesting to gradually release user tokens into circulation! It’s better to distribute more tokens with vesting than fewer, as dissatisfied users might immediately dump them on the market for sale.
You should give more thought to the image you’ve created in the network. You constantly post about some ridiculous meme tokens and completely useless AI-generated NFT collections that not only lack any artistic value but also provoke a sense of disgust overall. If you keep focusing on them and their “cult,” your entire Linea project will become associated with being a meme—a meme blockchain. Is that what you want?
Moreover, you blatantly misled the community by making false statements that Linea Voyage NFTs could be freely traded and that LXP for each NFT would transfer to the new owner at the time of distribution. And what was the result? Those who held more than two NFTs didn’t receive anything for the third one. Essentially, you deceived the community.
But it wasn’t the farmers—who minted these ridiculous NFTs every day all summer using scripts—that you deceived. It was the genuine enthusiasts, the degens, the opinion leaders, and the communities. This is a serious mistake, one that you’ll only realize when you distribute the tokens, as no one but the meme cult might end up supporting you.
Keep this in mind: there must be a vesting period for the tokens, or everything will be dumped on the market.
Man, if you were close to Linea, listened to the AMA, called the community, you would know the opinion of the co-founder of Consensys and ETH on this matter.
Complete nonsense and fabrications. If you were even a little involved, you would know that collections are launched rarely, and most of them were released through WL
Now tell me, what’s the difficulty for abusers in simulating a metric like commission volume? It’s laughable.
I agree, the metric is good, but only in combination with others. Filters should be complex. But your presentation and the interweaving of nonsense in the NFT part into it is complete crap.
Why should I care what the Linea team thinks about this issue? I’m reflecting the sentiments of the real crypto-enthusiast community. Users lost tens of thousands of dollars trusting the team’s promises and never receiving the LXP allocation, while they endlessly ran ridiculous campaigns for daily minting of useless NFTs, rewarding hundreds of thousands of scripters in the process! This was so widespread that even I, as a major influencer, was offered $25,000 for a single post in a Telegram group!
And what do we see in the project now? A card and meme tokens with a meme cult? It’s disgraceful! At this point, only the laziest aren’t releasing their own card.
Okay, I understand. You’re unhappy, you don’t like it. What are you doing here then? It seems like there were similar campaigns before and participants like you complained before, but for some reason continued to participate in them.
Scripters create multiple accounts, minimizing transaction costs, finding the most profitable routes, and avoiding any unnecessary spending. They won’t even need to be excluded from rewards—they’ll hardly earn anything under this distribution model. Meanwhile, real, dedicated users each spent no less than $50 on gas fees, and real projects burned hundreds of thousands in gas through their contracts.
This is the ideal and only objective metric that truly reflects each participant’s contribution to the ecosystem, regardless of whether they are scripters or ecosystem projects. At the same time, no one would deliberately waste money—everyone was solely focused on accumulating LXP.
It is the only fair metric that represents genuine project development, where contributions were made in dollars, not through some dumb AI-generated picture earning LXP in return. It’s so obvious that I didn’t even think it needed commenting.
No, this is not the only metric and if you google it, you will find this criterion as one of the recommended ones in various trash Twitter farms for sybils and chats that are publicly available. Not all farmers make cheap accounts, there is no point in substituting concepts.
I support the guys in that the criteria should be strict and multifaceted, this is the most difficult thing for sybils and farmers, because it requires not only resources, but also a huge amount of time
Did you discover this “only fair metric” because the LXP distribution for testnet NFTs didn’t turn out as you wanted? In every message, you emphasize that the airdrop should go to those who genuinely contributed to the network. What kind of contribution did you think a testnet NFT purchased from a marketplace provides to Linea when you bought them? Essentially, how are you any different from those buying memecoins or community-launched NFTs just for the sake of an airdrop?
Those who decided to leave the project and move on sold it, while those who believed in the project bought it. The terms were announced by the team a year ago, everything was outlined in articles and explained in detail. Everyone had the opportunity to buy it, but not everyone did, because you didn’t believe in the project. Yet suddenly, over a million people rushed in for stupid campaigns when gas fees dropped. LOL.
It doesn’t matter how you got it; 1 NFT = X LXP. This is not just an NFT or a meme picture. The people who own them were there at the very beginning, during the project’s inception. They played the key role, not some meme frogs generated by AI just for fun. We conducted transactions under high load, when even test ETH had to be purchased.
To obtain these NFTs, you had to have a Galaxy passport, and the conditions were the same for everyone. What was done at the end with the LXP distribution cannot be interpreted differently. I’ve already expressed my opinion on this matter here.
