In this calculation, 10% is reserved for airdrop.
For Lxp, 5% of the total airdrop is reserved.( 50 000 000 Linea Tokens)
Wallets eliminated in the latest update have been removed.
The price was set at the OTC price of $3 USD.
FDV 3 billion (arbitrum 4.7b )
Approximately 3 million token deficit occurred.
Note(If there is such a distribution, multiple wallet owners will get a better profit as in previous airdrops.)
1 Like
I made a ranking according to the amount of tokens to be distributed.
Premarket or OTC has nothing to do with linea
Hey @MountainXX , please follow the rules and be respectful to everyone here 
we are open to comments and feedback on the proposal, if you disagree it’s ok, but please be kind and respectful, thanks for understanding.
1 Like
But if you compare it with other layer2s, FDV seems appropriate.
Linea FDV 3 billion .Arbitrum 4.47 B
If you think this is nonsense, please state your argument.
1 Like
Do you also make the comparison with their launch? At what valuation did they launch?
1 Like
The launch price has nothing to do with the FDV. Market conditions may change, but we need to take the current FDV as a basis.
I think the reason why zksynk and starknet are low is because of their airdrops they didn’t reward their loyal community and had unclear rules which lead to a lot of FUD. So it has everything to do with it, most coins are down 70% from launch
2 Likes
Comparing linea with zkscam and starknet scam is FUD
I understand what you mean, but doesn’t it make more sense to calculate the current fdv instead of making up a big hopeful fdv?
even so, how much fdv should we expect? Beyond the arbitrum? Only 1.7b more.
Do you think this will change everything?
I don’t mean to offend you. I changed it.
Fdv is now at 4.7 billion, arbitrum value.
The FDV determined in the main heading was higher than their value.
The number of wallets caught my attention.
269,298 wallets have less than 1,499 LXP
415,504 have less than 1,999 LXP
These are likely Sybils or low-activity users. Sharing the airdrop across so many wallets will dilute rewards. I think it makes sense to either exclude them or start eligibility at 1,500 LXP while verifying their on-chain activity or social media engagement.
2 Likes
If we get 5% on LXP we’re so fckd up dude. It must be >15% on LXP only, otherwise with such bad market conditions and team’s greed the 2year + waiting wasn’t worth it
2 Likes
TOP allocation ZKsync = 100 000Zk = 10k $ today and 25k $ in listing day .
Berrachain allocation for free testnet usser = 500 berra token = 2,5k $ today. Alocation for PRO user = more than 20k-30k $
allocation for PRO user LINEA = 1- 2,5k $ …
Don’t you think there is something wrong with your model?
4 Likes
This distribution is a joke. The numbers speak for themselves massively diluted rewards, an artificial cap that benefits multi-wallet abusers, and a structure that punishes real contributors. The so-called “fair allocation” barely compensates loyal users while ensuring that those gaming the system walk away with a fortune.
5 Likes
This distribution model is not a model that I like. The point I want to emphasise here is the structure that will be formed as a result of the team allocating an amount of 5% for LXP.
I made it clear that with this kind of distribution model, multi-wallet owners will receive good rewards.
I shared it just to be a bad example.
5% is a bad amount.
What needs to be done here is to prevent this picture, which will be largely encountered if the Linea airdrop is around 10%.
1 Like
Let the Linea team handle it. No point in going around in circles.
10% is also bad. Read the forum before posting something like this.
1 Like
You’re forgetting the LXP-L.
Guys, TGE is at the door, everything has been decided long ago. Relax and enjoy.
2 Likes
