[quote=“Kanenz, post:1, topic:9007”]
UPDATE on Sybil list
Now that The team has successfully eliminated most of the Sybil accounts (it is worth noting that Sybil can’t be eliminated 100% but we must implement a system where they earn less). With the allowance of up to 20 wallets, the implementation of a tiered system now appears to be essential. Congratulations to the team and Nansen on this achievement.
Thanks to @0xebeggar, I requested the data from @ACHINTAMAJI9 on X
This is why I have consistently emphasized that **90% of wallets below 1,500 LXP are likely SybilsIt is evident that the majority of large-scale farmers, managing 20+ accounts, tend to fall within this range,**while the small farmers with 5+ accounts seat within 2k to 2k, the number of accounts reduced significantly as we move up the tiers highlighting the necessity of setting a minimum LXP threshold.
By comparing the provided tables, it becomes clear that the lowest tier has the highest concentration of Sybil accounts, with the percentage decreasing significantly as we move up the tiers. This pattern strongly supports the argument that the team must avoid the mistake of implementing a linear distribution model.
The data reinforces the importance of adopting a structured and tiered approach structure that minimizes rewards for such accounts(if <1500 lxp is to be considered) . This way, legitimate users are not adversely impacted, while Sybil accounts receive reduced incentives to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation.
> KNOWN ISSUES
LXP OVERAGE
I think the reason is this just like what @MountainXX said