For the nth time, ALL OF YOUR POINTS ARE INVALID because Linea already taken care of the sybil issue
Why are you consistently trying to justify a solution to a non-existing problem? Why is this so hard to understand? Linea is a multifunction chain where LXP is not it’s sole purpose. You are masking out majority of txn/time spent/fee spent (which reflects genuine usage of Linea) by using LXP as a sole criteria. Your proposal was never Linea community oriented, only LXP owner oriented.
You still have not answer my question on your prove of mutual inclusivity of REAL USER vs LXP. Lastly, user agreeing with you here is your confirmation bias when you failed to provide any rebuttal to my arguments.
Why are you people keep circling a round the sybil issue, it is non-existent since Linea+nansen took care of it. Hence it invalidated proposal’s foundation (sybil elimination). Hence, it just became allocation for LXP holders but not the community scheme.
Literally No one agreeing with you. Only showing that u lack common understanding and only yaping for your own interest. I’ve seen multiple people debating either LXP Holder or NFT community. And yet I’ve never seen people as ignorance as u in this space. U can’t even bring any data and keep repeating the same thing because maybe u can’t get enough LXP on time or probably u didn’t know there’s LXP campaign and only doing Arbitrum way of farming.
We all want, Linea team should allocate at least 25-30% for Airdrop without vesting for multiple months. Full unlock needed, yes, they can allocate some percentages for 2nd season quest by Community DAO vote. Just like $HYPE did.
Separate allocation for Marketing+Team+Ecosystem +Core Contributors, etc
No third party community or Kaito yappers
Because all of you here ONLY DID LXP/LXPL CAMPAIGNS and never really have much footprints on Linea (AKA farmers defending their crops). Someone has the audacity to replied: there is nothing to do after LXP. This is Linea, a multifunctional chain, not a LXP ONLY chain.
This was never a hybrid system, it’s LXP only. It’s the sole criteria, if you don’t have LXP(or enough LXP), nothing you do on chain worth a penny according to them.
Excellent proposal. In order to conduct a more thorough study and improve your system, I downloaded the CSV of LXP holders with more than 4.3k LXPs, available on lineascan.build
After the study, I concluded that the last tier (≥8,000) needs some adjustments. Regarding this being the last tier, I completely agree. In fact, all users with more than 8k LXPs had to participate in almost every campaign since the testnet and even purchase the Voyage NFTs.
What needs to be adjusted is the way distribution is done within this tier. I understand the logic of a linear distribution within the same tier to ensure fairness. And indeed, this linear distribution works well in all tiers, with those at the top of the tier receiving about 15-20% more than those at the bottom. However, in the first tier (≥8,000 LXPs), the discrepancy is much larger, with holder number 1 receiving 58.25% more than someone with 8k LXPs. This difference is very unfair. The only difference between someone with 12k LXPs and someone with 8k is the Voyage NFTs. Those with 12k were lucky enough to buy Voyage NFTs from different tiers, while those with 8k were not. Otherwise, their activity has been exactly the same.
My suggestion to improve this tier is to establish a maximum cap of tokens so that the distribution becomes more balanced within this one tier.
Here is the table showing the difference between the maximum and minimum allocation per tier:
LXP Tier
Diff between the max and minimium allocation within a tier
≥ 8,000
58,25%
7,000 - 7,999
14,27%
6,000 - 6,999
16,65%
5,000 - 5,999
19,98%
These data were calculated from the CSV of holders, available on lineascan.build
Hyperliquid and Kaito have allocated 30% of their total token supply to their communities, so why can’t Linea do the same? This has become a new normal model for successful projects.
Linea Team, please don’t disappoint your community it’s a humble request.
A lot of useless information. Why even add categories under 1500 LXP? And you and I and all the other not stupid people understand who is in this category - farmers. Apply your calculations excluding all sybill wallets and you might end up with a really good prorosal. Or do you have your own interest in this??
Same thing with you.
Linear Distribution Within Tiers (Micro-Level):
Within each tier, the tokens allocated to that tier are distributed proportionally based on individual LXP scores.
For instance, if a wallet holds 5% of the total LXP within their tier, they receive 5% of the tokens allocated to that tier.
wont really make a difference except the top tier tho. no one is holding anything slightly 5% of the total LXP of their tier cuz they would’ve moved to the next tier instead if they did.
