Besides LXP and LXP-L points, I think Linea should consider some % of airdrop based on chain transactions too with verified POH of course.
Some users left Linea chain after campaign and LXP-L has ended. So it does not reflect whole community of actual Linea chain users.
Absolutely NO! Totally sybil metric, serving no purpose and any logic when fees cost basically few cents. It reflects nothing but sybils working in the frame of old patterns and ditribution models, when transactions and volume had weight
Absolutely no. Users that left linea should get less allocation that more 
@marta Transactions is a completely sybil metric, which can be easily gamed for pennies. Read Kannenz comments on this issue. Old parameters as txn count/volume/active months are completely trash criteria reflecting nothing but desires of sybils to game the system and earn as much as possible with low cost
I mean if a user stopped using linea after the lxp capaigns it will most probably won’t use it after tge.I agree that there should be some metric to determine real on chain activity after those capaigns.
Do you think it’s hard for industrial sybil farms to imitate activity on-chain with their fully randomized software when gas actually cost 0.05$ per swap ?
I think it’s organic when user leave the chain from time to time and return back. LXP is a good indicator of your contribution, no matter how active you’re after all quests. It’s like telling a person who built a ship but stopped sailing it for some period of time that he’s not worthy of it.
For me someone who only did lxp and nothing after it it’s a sybil/airdrop hunter that will just dump it’s allocation on tge. There has to be a metric or multiple to see if an actual user used the chain after the lxp capaign and it shoud be taken into account.
Another attempt by sybils to push their interests. No bonuses for sybil criteria! There is someone to reward on the network and for what!
Here is my proposal. Given that most if not all sybils are eliminated. We can try
Let x to be the amount of tokens for airdrop
LXP
30%x reward for early contribution
LXPL
20%x reward for liquidity
Fee burned
20%x reward for OG users (high pre-dencun fees)
Number of TXN
10%x reward for footprint
Number of active days on Linea
10%x reward for dedication and consistency
MEME
5%x reward for expanding ecosystem participation
NFT
5%x reward for degen and risk taking
Wallet allocation = sum(category(user contribution/system total*(n)x)), where n=token weight%
How is singular metric like LXP is any different? You are just replacing industrial farmers to non-industrial farms. The distribution structure will be the same, and the community and REAL USERS get screwed.
Stop spamming
Everyone saw your proposal in different topic. Kanenz explained to you very clearly why its structure is so bad. I don’t agree with your model completely, it prioritizes sybils in a more way even relative to just using LXP as the only benchmark
I think users should be compensated for their transactions, interactions, and contributions within the network, especially if a robust Sybil analysis has already been performed to ensure that real users are participating. These users play a crucial role in testing key aspects like security, scalability, and other essential elements of the protocol. All of this should be taken into consideration and valued, as their activities help strengthen and improve the network as a whole.
@oozeias14
Everything is priced in LXP. Add some extra multi for pre-Dencun txns and you’re totally fine
The distribution structure will be the same as pre-sybil if LXP is the sole metric. The non-industrial farmers (<20 wallets) will receive most of the rewards and the community gets peanut, this is NOT DECENTRALIZATION. Do you have a lot of LXP?