I’ve been seeing Scoring systems lately. And I see that some people are worried about it.
What do I mean by that?
For example
. 3000 LXP = 3 points
. 300000 LXP-L = 3 points
. 12 months of activity = 3 points.
. Meme token holders = 3 points.
These are completely wrong in my opinion. Their valuations are completely opposite to each other. They cannot be in the same scoring system.
Apples, pears and mangoes are different things, friends, you cannot create a whole by plucking different things and putting them together. These are not things that complement each other. This will lead to injustice.
LXP and LXP-L are not the same thing and the percentage of token amount to be allocated to them will be different. We know that LXP is much more valuable than LXP-L. (The team has repeatedly stated this)
In addition, the team will be able to reward according to the criteria they wish and these rewards will be met from different pools.
The biggest handicap of the scoring system is that it does not provide fair rewards, and important things will be confused with unimportant sybil activities.
Frankly, I think that the scoring discussions in the forum so far are completely wrong.
I think that the weight of the pool system will be reduced as follows. Each pool will contain tiers within itself.
x% = LXP
x% =LXP-L
x% =Special community rewards and onchain datas.(fee,meme token holders,og nfts)